juggaloweb.net rate it

[juggaloweb]

well what do you guys think?

[Pimpin Monkey]

fresh juggalo..

check out DenverJuggalos.com

[juggaloweb]

allready have :)

join my forum i think u did on our old forums

[Pimpin Monkey]

It wasn't me.. more than likely one of tha other people who used to work on tha site.. I've recently put out a new layout..

[juggaloweb]

nice

[Bruce]

Your site is okay, but I think you should find a better place for the copyright info. The bottom of the page would be better than all scrunched up on the right side.

http://members.verizon.net/~vze2tkr8/juggalo.gif

[Giancarlo]

My official review of Juggaloweb...

- Not a bad design but isn't very appealing
- The logo isn't that great
- The green text in the middle is an eyesore.
- Keep all of the text consistent
- Overall it doesn't look too professional... the pages are cluttered. You should go through and rethink them a bit, particularily the text layout.

Graphics: 5 out of 10
Content: 6.7 out of 10
Style/Layout: 7.9 out of 10

Overall: 65% (6.5 out of 10)

[juggaloweb]

ok

#1 am i selling stuff? no therefor its not supposed to be professional
#2 how is the logo not good?

#3 green is cause of news that people should read

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by juggaloweb
ok

#1 am i selling stuff? no therefor its not supposed to be professional

Ummm... not necessarily... if you want visitors back again you should make professional.



#2 how is the logo not good?

It looks gritty...



#3 green is cause of news that people should read

Green is very bright though... maybe you should change it to silver.

[juggaloweb]

well its the logo for that type of site

[Pimpin Monkey]

Believe me, I've read a lot of his post, Giancarlo won't get that type of site. Nothing against you Giancarlo, its just not your style!

[Pimpin Monkey]

btw, that was a shot at Giancarlo..

Proud left-winger..

:D

[trenzterra]

Organised: 245/250
Images matches layout: 240/250
Design: 240/250
Speed: 245/250

Comments: The green is a little too striking


Overall: 970/1000

[keith]

Originally posted by Phrozen
Your site is okay, but I think you should find a better place for the copyright info. The bottom of the page would be better than all scrunched up on the right side.

http://members.verizon.net/~vze2tkr8/juggalo.gif haha, like anyone's going to steal that crappy design... and even if anyone would, i doubt a guy running a site like that and calling that girl a babe would prosecute anyone to the fullest extent of the law.

[keith]

Originally posted by trenzterra
Organised: 245/250
Images matches layout: 240/250
Design: 240/250
Speed: 245/250

Comments: The green is a little too striking


Overall: 970/1000 i can't believe you just gave him a 97/100... i'd give him a 17 on a good day, but only because he used tables. the iframes and stupid goth looks suck. and the term "mad funny" makes me want to stab myself in the eye.

[Pimpin Monkey]

Originally posted by keith
and the term "mad funny" makes me want to stab myself in the eye.

you know I'd love to see that happen :D

[keith]

i'd love to as well if i see one more ----ty site about that no-talent, waste of flesh group.

[juggaloweb]

lmao

of course a dumb --- hata

figure

and thanks trenzterra actually someone with a real opinion

and keith i have had people "shutdown" for stealin my stuff
this design took 10 minutes and is very good compared to any crap u could put out.


lastly "no flaming"
haha
i guess that rule goes good eh?

[keith]

any crap i could put out?? ah hahahahahaha... you've obviously never seen anything i've "put out".

you're layout just plain blows. i could throw something together in 5 minutes in my sleep and it'd be ten times better than the crap you have there. the layout is just plain hideous.

and where did i flame anyone earlier? nowhere!

[juggaloweb]

-waits for url to ya site

[vik13]

well, i can't rate this site, becasue it would be too biased, as i too hate insane clown posse. and if you wanna see keith's site, click on the WWW button.

[keith]

alright smartass...

the server weezerfans.com is on is currently under a dos attack [or so i'm told by my host]:
http://www.weezerfans.com [edit: ok, it's finally back online]

oh yeah, i should also say i've recently passed the millionth hit mark [about 17,000 visitors ago], so people must like what they see... i'll try not to laugh too hard when comparing yours to mine :cool:

there's also http://www.joebluhm.com [my brother's site i'm doing for him]. not too great, but it blows yours out of the water...

i have others if your still not convinced [which should be impossible].

[conkermaniac]

Again, trentzerra's incapability of rating webpages is shown once again. He gave that other site (which I gave a C) a 100%. He doesn't have any standard, really.

- Logo is pretty bland and boring.

- Big no-no. NEVER under any circumstances make your user have to scroll right on a window. That is the most annoying aspect of some of your pages. Especially since one of your pages was elongated simply because of an unnecessarily long image...If you have a large image (in terms of pixels) file, it is excusable, but since this is an .html document, not a .gif file, I don't think there's much for you to say. BTW, on your image gallery, I had to scroll right anyway. That middle column is FAR too narrow and small. It is messing your whole website up, especially when you link to remotely hosted services, and the stuff doesn't fit in the column.

- Formatting of text in middle column doesn't look too great. Much better division needed. Using big text and separators is not called formatting. Make it neat and attractive. This happens throughout your ENTIRE site, and trust me, users don't like it. "Contest" page is the worst that I have seen on your website.

- Please...learn how to get rid of the borders on an image. It looks unprofessional.

- Do you really need more junk than you have already? Stuff like "Free Lotto", "Hate Mail", "Screensavers", and "Video". Why? First, everybody hates advertising. Next, "Hate Mail", "Screensavers", and "Video" could go under one section: "Downloads". Now, I have no clue why your Downloads section is filled with TOTAL JUNK, but you could get rid of all of that. Cutting down on sections is something you really have to start worrying about. Next, I would like to ask you why you have a "Backgrounds" section when the wallpapers are simply taken from another site? Original and exclusive content, please!

- No "Contact Us" page? I'm rather disappointed. Never link to an e-mail address straight from the menu.

- OK, now I have absolutely no clue how you're going to fit articles in one column. From what I have seen in your first article, they are far too brief and undeserving of the title "Article".

- Grammar mistakes evident throughout the entire website.

- Nav bar headers are hard to see.

- What is the Joker Cards section? They seem to serve little purpose.

- I'm getting the feeling your hosting warez MP3s on your site.

Content: 60
Layout: 45
Colors/Images/Text: 55
Technical: 75

Overall (not an average): 62%

[R. K. Raja]

Originally posted by trenzterra
Organised: 245/250
Images matches layout: 240/250
Design: 240/250
Speed: 245/250

Comments: The green is a little too striking


Overall: 970/1000


It's not a bad site but I don't think it's THAT good. My page only got a 943 :(

[conkermaniac]

That's because trentzerra can't review sites. :rolleyes: I bet he never even goes past the first three pages. Your site clearly is the complete opposite of this website, IMO, and there is absolutely no way that this site, with its current design, will ever reach the standards you have set.

[dragosul]

link unable to find :(

[ll00000ll]

Hi dud,
Nice site, i like the style sheet
but try to do something about that logo
without any affence but it sucks.
it looks crapy.

but if you leave that away 2 thumbs up

P.S make de logo lesser in the hight so the hole page fites
because now you have 2 scrollbars a little anoying

Greets
ll00000ll

[keith]

...while i'm pounding juggaloweb.net into the ground, here's another one i've recently redesigned for someone. very simple, yet it also annhiliates his 'juggaloweb'.

www.superdrag.org

[juggaloweb]

Originally posted by keith
...while i'm pounding juggaloweb.net into the ground, here's another one i've recently redesigned for someone. very simple, yet it also annhiliates his 'juggaloweb'.

www.superdrag.org

not really not an eye catcher

the weezer site(yes i like them and ima juggalo) is pretty nice site keith 2 thumbs up :)

i give it a 95!

superdrag
bleh 78

the other one i couldnt rate because there is nothing but a layout which is ok

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by Hatchet Ryda
btw, that was a shot at Giancarlo..

Proud left-winger..

:D

I can't believe I missed this... Hatchet ---- off.

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by Hatchet Ryda
Believe me, I've read a lot of his post, Giancarlo won't get that type of site. Nothing against you Giancarlo, its just not your style!

You truely are a loser.

[keith]

Originally posted by juggaloweb


not really not an eye catcher

the weezer site(yes i like them and ima juggalo) is pretty nice site keith 2 thumbs up :)

i give it a 95!

superdrag
bleh 78

the other one i couldnt rate because there is nothing but a layout which is ok wasn't asking for reviews. never have, never will. i'm content with where i'm at
Originally posted by keith
...while i'm pounding juggaloweb.net into the ground, here's another one i've recently redesigned for someone. very simple, yet it also annhiliates his 'juggaloweb'.

www.superdrag.orgyou must have missed the "i know it's very simple" part. i made it that way. not every site out there need a killer design. i would have guessed you of all people would understand that... :cool:

[juggaloweb]

but people still come back to my site and i dont get any complaints
and many have said they like it.

therefor you = hating icp =you hating my site therefor i dont think bout ya opinion much

[keith]

and therein lies the ----tiness. black and grey is a terrile combination. even though the band is crap, it doesn't mean the site has to be. it's just an overall ugly site. nothing to do with the band.

[juggaloweb]

your opinion on colors
-shrugs

[keith]

well, we've figured out why it looks so crappy... you ask for opinions, and when they're given you don't listen. sad.

[juggaloweb]

yes i do actually

im working on a new look anyway

[Space Ghost]

content is ok
babe of the week.. lol. :biggrin2:
colors are ok
forums 0pen now? (focusing on the 0)

Overall: 7.5/10

[juggaloweb]

Thanks Game 1 of the few good opinions here

actually keith is the only one with the b/s opinion so yeh

and BOTW lol? what that spose to mean

and whoever said about too many things on the menu i cut it down i took off articles hate mail n some other crap
menu is perfectly even now
well on the new look & the new lookwill be up tomorrow

[Blank Verse]

OK, so if someone kisses your ---, it's a good review, but if someone has a suggestion to make, that's bad? If you can't handle a little criticism, you shouldn't post for review.

And trust me, this isn't "hating"...I can hate.

[awayfromforum]

sorry dude but your site is crap. Your scrollbars are black and so is the background so you can hardly see them.

I dont like the color combinations and when i went to your site it took ages to load.

my opinion is that the site needs some serious work done to it.

[juggaloweb]

-changed colors n ---- n logo

and blank ya didnt read nwhat i said correctly but im not gonna explain now that wouldnt be fun

[keith]

b/s opinions... har har har

i agree with blank verse and xpfreak 200%

[juggaloweb]

no actually keith if ya look i did do some recomendations like removing ---- that aint used, and colors and banner

actually the colors i got are more psychopathic than what i had

[keith]

a psychopathic website... ah hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

that's so moronic, trying to be ------ while [smirk] coding html and working with a paint program.... oh no!...

sheez