PDA

View Full Version : New hosting template



X3r0X
June 10th, 2006, 21:42
Hey everyone,

Just made it a few minutes ago, took a little under an hour to make. Just felt like trying something new, so I went for a professional look. I may endeavour to sell it yet, so I've just included a watermarked image. Please, tell me what you think and what could be done to improve it :).

Image: http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/7672/screenshot5rd.jpg

Thanks,
Chris

Johnson
June 10th, 2006, 21:59
More "candy" than professional.

X3r0X
June 10th, 2006, 22:06
Yeah, instead of just saying "candy" it would be nice to tell me as to how you came to the conclusion it looked like "candy" and not "professional".

Thanks all the same.

AvailNetworks
June 11th, 2006, 10:18
I agree with Johnson, when going for a "professional" look I think you have to make it a little more matte finish and not so glossy.

the colors are nice, vibrant and pleasant but just don't scream professionalism

Johnson
June 11th, 2006, 23:52
Exactly, glossy. Candy is also another name for that type of look.

iBrightDev
June 12th, 2006, 08:02
the site is very nice and clean, buy as Mr.J said, it is to candy for a professional hosting site.

veggie1232
June 12th, 2006, 09:26
i like it allot actually it just needs more structure theres not enough to look at

and im not really going to say the design is bad or good because its kinf of lame only (under a hour) went into it as a designer i spent several hours making my designs myabe thats why most people think im a good designer

its missing structure and the glossy thing really isnt the problem making it not look professinal. make the content area ALOT smaller and use that space for other things with other important info

and the boxes next to each plan is a good idea but try this

either make the 1st box green second box orange (good how it is now) and last box blue so it makes each plan seam more (uniqe)

or make the first plan have 1 box
second plan have 2 boxes
and third plan have 3 boxes probibly make the boxes in plans 2 and 3 smaller

thats just on detail i think should be added

(wow my spelling sucks)