SC-Daniel
March 25th, 2008, 21:32
Hey Guys,
We just started offering VPS hosting not to long ago and have been doing really well! We are using OpenVZ with HyperVM and so far everything has been great...
I am curious what other companies have had a better result with... OpenVZ or Xen?
I like the idea of Xen and how it does not allow you to overload the server. But OpenVZ is said to work better with HyperVM.
Is there any real difference in performance? All of our nodes have at least 1 quad core with 8 gigs of RAM, so have dual quads.
The way we have OpenVZ setup everyone gets a dedicated RAM and CPU amount and no burst. For instance, one of our plans is as follows:
50GB Disk Space
500GB BW
500MHz CPU
512MB RAM
It is working great and really cuts down on CPU hogs, but would Xen be better for this type of setup?
We just started offering VPS hosting not to long ago and have been doing really well! We are using OpenVZ with HyperVM and so far everything has been great...
I am curious what other companies have had a better result with... OpenVZ or Xen?
I like the idea of Xen and how it does not allow you to overload the server. But OpenVZ is said to work better with HyperVM.
Is there any real difference in performance? All of our nodes have at least 1 quad core with 8 gigs of RAM, so have dual quads.
The way we have OpenVZ setup everyone gets a dedicated RAM and CPU amount and no burst. For instance, one of our plans is as follows:
50GB Disk Space
500GB BW
500MHz CPU
512MB RAM
It is working great and really cuts down on CPU hogs, but would Xen be better for this type of setup?