PDA

View Full Version : What Would it Take to Run This?


fattony69
January 31st, 2009, 16:40
How many dedicated servers and the price?

http://www.mythica.org/mrtg/total.html
fnixws
January 31st, 2009, 17:10
All those charts show is bandwidth usage, not CPU load or RAM usage, wich is the question your really asking.
fattony69
January 31st, 2009, 17:34
All those charts show is bandwidth usage, not CPU load or RAM usage, wich is the question your really asking.

is it possible to analyze from what is shown?
Volt.Networks
January 31st, 2009, 18:10
Nope, CPU usage and RAM usage is more important than bandwidth usage in this case.
RU-Adam
January 31st, 2009, 21:32
It looks like a file hosting site? If so you would just need a 100mbit port or better and enough hard drives to store all of the files.
~ServerPoint~
February 3rd, 2009, 02:32
Nope, CPU usage and RAM usage is more important than bandwidth usage in this case.
I would say they are conected to each other and influence to each other.
WireSix-Ryan
February 3rd, 2009, 02:34
1 server could easily do that.
SiberForum
February 6th, 2009, 02:26
On the WHT you can leave free quote for the certain request and you will see what the subscribed companies will be able to offer you
Technics
February 7th, 2009, 17:25
How many dedicated servers and the price?

http://www.mythica.org/mrtg/total.html

Are you referring to the graphing aspect? If so MRTG will run happily on a small VPS :)

Traffic Wise, a decent spec'd VPS not on an oversold node or a CoreDuo would cope if optomizied.
tru1
February 10th, 2009, 03:26
I think he was referring to the server specs, not the MRTG.

If you're going into file hosting, better have enough HDD to support all the hosted files, not to mention a good deal for BW as if your site gets popular, you want to stay away from overage charges.

There's no mathmatical formula you can use to decide which server will work best, but i wouldn't recommend a p4 or lower :-P
FortressDewey
February 13th, 2009, 12:58
.....

There's no mathmatical formula you can use to decide which server will work best, but i wouldn't recommend a p4 or lower :-P

Agreed, P4 or better
LSComputers
February 14th, 2009, 15:32
Hey,

You could use an clustered-cloud hosting provider to do this and reduce your costs greatly. There are currently two decent priced companies that offer clusterd-cloud hosting.
HostingITrust
February 21st, 2009, 04:55
I wonder what those graphs are showing! Why don't you put your hosting in terms of bandwidth, ram, harddisk etc?