free
This is our archive, please go to the main forum page for the latest discussions and news about free web hosting.


Cheaper than Rackshack?

ViEtGuRL
April 17th, 2002, 17:09
Are there any other places that offer dedicated servers for just a little (don't need like a free one or anything) cheaper than RackShack that is pretty good quality?

MN-Carl
April 17th, 2002, 17:28
cheaper per month or cheaper setup :confused2

Chicken
April 17th, 2002, 18:43
There are sub-$100 dedicated server offers. I couldn't recommend one place over another (nor can I think of any off the top of my head), however they do exist. There are also VPS (Virtual Private Servers), which are similar (you still get root and can install anything you need for the most part). These plans are generally $50 on up.

ducktape
April 17th, 2002, 18:49
tera-byte has a vps for $69 a month with no setup i think 2 gigs of space and im not sure of transfer.

mewgood
April 17th, 2002, 19:13
I think RackShack is the cheapest.
They offer 400gb.. I don't think other companies can off this for 100 dollars a month..

Haze
April 17th, 2002, 20:09
I think these might be of interest:

http://www.eservers.biz which is a reseller for:
http://www.tranxactglobal.com
Also, worth a mention is:
http://www.webreseller.net

Gayowulf
April 17th, 2002, 23:59
Rackshack is cheap, but, in many ways, you are getting what you pay for. If not less.

eservers.biz have skyhigh setup prices, and rock bottom monthly payments. averaged over a year it is cheaper than RS. I have never used eservers.biz before, so I cant comment on performance.

You basically have two choices economy or performance and service. if you want cheap go with RS or eservers.biz i doubt you will score better than that unless you have your own server to colo somewhere.

If you want performance there are countless other places to check out

murat
April 18th, 2002, 06:48
i heard there is a german one which is cheaper than rackshack, but i forget the url :mad:

Technics
April 18th, 2002, 08:20
http://www.4webspace.com is an alternative.

Haze
April 18th, 2002, 19:31
Actually eservers.biz servers are much better in quality that RackShack.net, thats why they have a higher setup.

Bruce
April 18th, 2002, 19:59
RackShack's P4 special is just insane though. P4 1.7GHz, 1GB RAM, 2 60GB HD, and 600GB data transfer for $139. No one can compete with prices like that.

Perhaps you may find a provider that has an old box laying around that you could get for a low price, but you'l be lucky to find much of anything cheaper than RS.

Gayowulf
April 18th, 2002, 23:32
The thing with those is that they sell out so fast. :(

How is p4 as a server processor?

murat
April 19th, 2002, 07:28
here is a cheap german one
www.server4free.de
you only pay the transfer, not the server

ducktape
April 19th, 2002, 09:24
Originally posted by murat
here is a cheap german one
www.server4free.de
you only pay the transfer, not the server

So cheap all they could afford is a 404 :D

Peo
April 19th, 2002, 10:01
huh? the site loads fine for me.

ac3
April 19th, 2002, 10:39
Originally posted by Gayowulf
How is p4 as a server processor?
P4 as server = ----

If i had the choice, i'd choose dual or even single P3.

P4 is a performance chip, nothing else.

Bruce
April 19th, 2002, 10:53
But still, for that price I'd take anything. Even seeing as they use Cogent, the bandwidth itself is still worth more than what they're charging.

ducktape
April 19th, 2002, 10:56
Originally posted by Peo
huh? the site loads fine for me.

it loads for me now too!

Archbob
April 20th, 2002, 18:50
I haven't seen a dedicated services cheaper and rackshack, most I've seen under $100 are co-location.

Daniel
April 20th, 2002, 20:40
IF I convince my boss, I can colo for free :cool:

BTW, my work doesn't have the dual t3s anymore, we now have an full duplex OC-3. :D

murat
April 27th, 2002, 15:34
Originally posted by Archbob
I haven't seen a dedicated services cheaper and rackshack, most I've seen under $100 are co-location.
whats a co location ?

xsnetwork
April 27th, 2002, 15:52
co-location is where you house YOUR OWN server at somewhere with mucho bandwith (hopefully) and you pay them for monthly for powering your server and providing the bandwith to YOUR server etc

PaRaDoX
May 26th, 2002, 20:36
Isn't that similar to reselling?

Daniel
May 26th, 2002, 21:04
Originally posted by PaRaDoX
Isn't that similar to reselling?

No....

reselling is reselling your paid space of a server from a company.

Co-location is that you send in your own server(you can send in a peice of crap from your basement) and have it hooked up to the companies connection.

akaize
June 5th, 2002, 15:36
Can I know some VDS providers?

Daniel
June 5th, 2002, 21:18
www.terra-byte.com

BurstNET
June 7th, 2002, 00:35
Check out our new NOCSTER line of sub-$100 MANAGED dedicated server offerings:

http://www.nocster.net

Sean R.
BurstNET

guitarnerd
June 7th, 2002, 17:14
Originally posted by Gayowulf
The thing with those is that they sell out so fast. :(

How is p4 as a server processor?
I think the best stable and keeps cooler.

xzx
June 24th, 2002, 10:54
Originally posted by Bruce
RackShack's P4 special is just insane though. P4 1.7GHz, 1GB RAM, 2 60GB HD, and 600GB data transfer for $139. No one can compete with prices like that.

Perhaps you may find a provider that has an old box laying around that you could get for a low price, but you'l be lucky to find much of anything cheaper than RS.

Do they still have that deal? url....

Moonman
June 25th, 2002, 02:41
woah talk about major thread digging, im not sure about that rackshack offer, but eservers.biz now has no setup and 500GB transfer.

Daniel
June 25th, 2002, 17:41
Originally posted by Moonman
woah talk about major thread digging


Erm...this was still one of the top threads in the forum.

Bruce
June 25th, 2002, 18:52
Originally posted by Daniel



Erm...this was still one of the top threads in the forum. Well, the thread is two months old.

Daniel
June 25th, 2002, 20:50
Originally posted by Bruce
Well, the thread is two months old.

But it was still at the top of the list of threads in this forum so how can you dig it up? It was already at the top. :chinese2:

guitarnerd
June 25th, 2002, 20:59
Dude not many people post in this forum so stop arguing

Daniel
June 25th, 2002, 21:11
Originally posted by guitarnerd
Dude not many people post in this forum so stop arguing

Exactly my point. So how is it possible to dig up a thread here?

Bruce
June 25th, 2002, 21:16
Originally posted by Daniel
So how is it possible to dig up a thread here? It's a figure of speech. Replying to a thread more than a week or so old is considered 'digging up a thread'. Where the thread is located on a page is irrelavant.

guitarnerd
June 26th, 2002, 02:09
Even if you don't want to consider it "digging it up" it is like if a court where to bring up a law suit that is 2 years old and have another trial. A mod should just close this

xzx
June 26th, 2002, 10:16
Well, No one is actually posting anything relevant so this tread should be closed.





  
  News · Search free hosts · Free file hosting · Free image hosting · Reviews · Forums · Related Links · Advertising Info · Contact Us


Copyright © 1996-2008 Per Olof Sandholm. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum