Am I the only one who supports bush?

[Kaliber]

I support bush, i think he should go and blow the fu<k out of iraq.

Ask your self this: Is the cost of having war bigger than if we don't?

[Gayowulf]

There is no legal justification for any invasion or associated bombing of Iraq. There is no hard evidence that Iraq possesses any weapons of mass destruction and there is no substantiated connection between the Government of Iraq, September 11th, and the al Qaeda network. Iraq's neighbours, the ones most at risk from Iraq's weapons, are against this war, as are top military professionals in Britain and the US as well as many international organizations and countries around the world, and a great majority of people in the US.

whats the cost of not having the war?

[Kaliber]

Thats exactly what im saying, are the risks of them having these weapons greater than a war. What if they decide to use them

[Gayowulf]

as I said, there is no hard evidence that these "weapons of mass destruction" exist

here's a little list of countries that the US has bombed since WWII

China 1945-46, 1950-53
Korea 1950-53
Guatemala 1954, 1960, 1967-69
Indonesia 1958
Cuba 1959-61
Congo 1964
Peru 1965
Laos 1964-73
Vietnam 1961-73
Cambodia 1969-70
Lebanon 1983-84
Grenada 1983
Libya 1986
El Salvador 1980s
Nicaragua 1980s
Panama 1989
Bosnia 1985
Sudan 1998
Former Yugoslavia 1999
Iraq 1991-20??
Afghanistan 1998, 2001-02

[conkermaniac]

Originally posted by Kaliber
Thats exactly what im saying, are the risks of them having these weapons greater than a war. What if they decide to use them

Yes, I agree. If we truly are afraid of world destruction, then everyone should attack the United States, since chances are, the US is the one that will blow up the whole world. After all, just look at the list that Gayowulf has provided! If you didn't realize, that's over 11% of all the countries in the world that the US has bombed! Now what percentage of the world has Iraq bombed?

[keith]

Originally posted by Kaliber
I support bush, i think he should go and blow the fu<k out of iraq. you're not the only one.

[keith]

Originally posted by Gayowulf
There is no hard evidence that Iraq possesses any weapons of mass destruction.yes there is, and bush has brought it forward many times. you'd just rather not believe it.

[sonichost.net]

Am I the only one who supports bush?

No, I support Mr. Bush simply because of the fact he is by chance our president.

I didn't vote for him.
I wouldn't vote for him.

But I support his actions because I don't see how a country can be strong if they don't back and trust in their president.

[conkermaniac]

Originally posted by sonichost.net


No, I support Mr. Bush simply because of the fact he is by chance our president.

I didn't vote for him.
I wouldn't vote for him.

But I support his actions because I don't see how a country can be strong if they don't back and trust in their president.

Hmm...good point. The US may be doomed, as almost nobody wants nor thinks that the US will remain the "world leader" for this century, but if the people can rally behind their leader for once, perhaps they may not fall to the bottom.

[Kaliber]

Originally posted by conkermaniac


Yes, I agree. If we truly are afraid of world destruction, then everyone should attack the United States, since chances are, the US is the one that will blow up the whole world. After all, just look at the list that Gayowulf has provided! If you didn't realize, that's over 11% of all the countries in the world that the US has bombed! Now what percentage of the world has Iraq bombed? I dunno what percentage of the world Iraq has bombed, but most times it had been for good cause when the USA bombs. That is not what im talking about. Im talking about the development of nuclear weapons etc.. It is quickly becoming east v west.

Some of these people have nothing to lose, and if they get their hands on them (haven't they already) what will happen?

You people are just blinded, thats just what bush is telling us! Imagine what there not telling us.

Have a long hard think about it.

[conkermaniac]

Originally posted by Kaliber
I dunno what percentage of the world Iraq has bombed, but most times it had been for good cause when the USA bombs. That is not what im talking about. Im talking about the development of nuclear weapons etc.. It is quickly becoming east v west.

Some of these people have nothing to lose, and if they get their hands on them (haven't they already) what will happen?

You people are just blinded, thats just what bush is telling us! Imagine what there not telling us.

Have a long hard think about it.

Good cause... *cough* *cough* ...I suppose the Vietnam War was a good cause, and so was assassinating the leaders of other countries. I'm looking over that list, and dropping half of those bombs was not justified in anyway.

If Iraq has to get rid of its nuclear weapons, then to be fair, so should the US. I don't think the world should trust the US with its nuclear weapons anymore than the US should trust the world.

[Kaliber]

Originally posted by conkermaniac


Good cause... *cough* *cough* ...I suppose the Vietnam War was a good cause

Originally posted by Kaliber

but most times it had been for good cause when the USA bombs
Read carefully

[conkermaniac]

Originally posted by Kaliber

Read carefully

You should too. ;)


I'm looking over that list, and the dropping of half those bombs was not justified in anyway

[Kaliber]

Whats that supposed to mean?