View Full Version : premium shared hosting comparable to futurequest
lightusr
December 6th, 2002, 12:46
I'm looking for a webhost that provides at least 100-200mb of space minimum, between 5-10gb transfer, apop, possibly imap, nice control panel (hsphere or cpanel), multiple domains (at least pointers), dedicated ip, MySQL dbs (at least 1).
The emphasis is on reliability and value. I've been spoiled by Futurequest's services and great support community but I want more disk space and at least a couple of MySQL db's but at Futurequest, that'll almost double my costs.
Basically I'm looking for a high-end shared host. I'm currently very interested in Fluidhosting.com but not much feedback is out there. Dreamhost was a consideration but a static ip shouldn't cost extra.
Daniel
December 6th, 2002, 15:29
Fluidhosting.com
SCSI drives + Internap Bandwidth = teh win.
Bruce
December 6th, 2002, 16:24
Originally posted by Daniel
SCSI drives + Internap Bandwidth = teh win. Hey! That's my line. :p
lightusr, as you said you were already looking at FluidHosting, I feel I should share my opinion on them.
I agree that there isn't much feedback to be found about them, but I would assume it's because the majority of people today aren't interested in the high-end area. Most people seem to be looking for plans less than $50 annually. What little information you do find about FluidHosting, however, will only be good.
I've been a happy customer of their's since February of this year. Since they've been at Internap in Boston, downtime has been non-existant. If you ever need any support, Dave and Jim are a couple of great guys. They're very knowledgeable people who are willing to go that extra mile for you.
If you're looking for a high-end host, you can't go wrong with them. I would definitely reccomend them to anyone.
Daniel
December 7th, 2002, 00:47
Originally posted by Bruce
Hey! That's my line. :p
Mine now. :p
I would probably gone with Fluidhosting if I had a mission critical site...but since I don't(check sig).
Archbob
December 8th, 2002, 01:58
Originally posted by Bruce
Hey! That's my line. :p
lightusr, as you said you were already looking at FluidHosting, I feel I should share my opinion on them.
I agree that there isn't much feedback to be found about them, but I would assume it's because the majority of people today aren't interested in the high-end area. Most people seem to be looking for plans less than $50 annually. What little information you do find about FluidHosting, however, will only be good.
I've been a happy customer of their's since February of this year. Since they've been at Internap in Boston, downtime has been non-existant. If you ever need any support, Dave and Jim are a couple of great guys. They're very knowledgeable people who are willing to go that extra mile for you.
If you're looking for a high-end host, you can't go wrong with them. I would definitely reccomend them to anyone.
I thought you didn't have a site? Wait, why do you have premium hosting with a site? :p
Anyways I've heard good things about fluid hosting also.
Jan
December 8th, 2002, 02:09
Originally posted by Archbob
I thought you didn't have a site? Wait, why do you have premium hosting with a site? :p .
Where did you get that impression? :confused:
www.worldzonepro.com are also good, they have H-Sphere and 4 MySQL dbs although in the ad at the top of this forum it says 6 :confused:, also you can have multiple domains (6). I have been using them since March on two accounts :)
Archbob
December 8th, 2002, 02:16
Bruce mentioned somewhere in another thread a while ago that he didn't actually have a site.
Bruce
December 8th, 2002, 08:35
Yes, I remember that post you are referring too.
Techincally I don't have a site (I do, but there's currently nothing there at the moment), but I'm still paying $15 a month.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.