PDA

View Full Version : Cut to the chase...



polestar
April 8th, 2001, 12:56
IMHO, the best free webspace provider has got to be F2S.com

This is what I've found - any disagreements/problems?

*No ads*

The whole thing seems very fast to me (I joined about a month ago). FTP uploads are much faster than tripod. Page sometimes a little slow to start loading when I key in the URL, but once it kicks in it's a very satisfactory page download speed.

Ample space for most people's genuine needs. I always used to think I needed more space than I really do. Use another host for any downloads and link to them, because ZIP, MP3, EXE, and most others are forbidden to download - but it lets you upload them all :-(

Short URL - http://www.mysite.f2s.com

Allowed to have ad revenue schemes.

Not very user-friendly but that's bearable for me.

Look out for my page being uploaded there once and for all very soon!

Any better (ie faster) hosts with no ads, ftp, subdomains?

I don't think so!!!

Phil
April 8th, 2001, 13:55
Polestar,

I don't know if you are new to f2s.com but here is the biggest disadvantage of f2s.com

I am in the USA and I find that the MySQL database is extremely unreliable and often very slow. If you are in the UK, things maybe faster and more reliable.
I have the phpBB board set up there and often time it does not even connect to the database. And remember that f2s.com only offers 5 MB of MySQL.

I have heard that just regular page on f2s.com is not too bad if you don't use database. I only use f2s.com for my phpBB board so I don't know about the speed of regular webpages.

Otherwise, f2s.com is not so bad because of all its features.

Robert
April 8th, 2001, 15:01
If you say they are the best, how come your site is hosted by Tripod?

RonDoubt
April 8th, 2001, 16:24
If you say they are the best, how come your site is hosted by Tripod?

He says he plans on moving over to F2S.

But I would probably stick with tripod if i was him. They offer more space and are one of the faster FWPs

gyrbo
April 9th, 2001, 02:28
I think digitalrice is pretty good. FTP, no ads,PHP,CGI,SSI,faster than F2s. Only disadvantage is than they don't have MySQL, thats the reason my forum will remain at F2S.

angeth
April 9th, 2001, 02:44
I would have to agree that F2S is the best host. Digital rice has it's pluses...But when it comes down to it, I really dislike NT servers-especially with the new version that DR is running.