34sp.com

[CrashWire]

Just wanted to hear everyone's views on this website. I know that its always "I get what I pay for", but if there are any bad stories or compliments about this site, please share them here so that I can decide whether to join or not.

[Synergy]

You would be hosted on a RAQ. Thats a NONO.

[Technics]

whats wrong with an RAQ?

[jiminsd]

Yah... What's wrong with a RAQ?

[ashben]

Yah... What's wrong with a RAQ?

[Cael]

Yah... What's wrong with a RAQ?

[Synergy]

There is nothing wrong with a RAQ, just in my opinion. People with CGI LOOPS can drain the raq to its knees. :) Please don't find me offensive, I'm a CPanel fan..

[ashben]

But doesn't like a CGI security wrapper take care of stuff like this.

[iwod]

Um...by the way... none of you guys anzswer any part of his question...........
If you are ona very very very very tight budget. then go for it. it is pretty good for its price.
Otherwise, don't uses it. You may use it for a small site since it only offer 400mb/month.
They are pretty reliable.

[Synergy]

They are good for like a personal site. I use them for POP3 EMAIL. :)

[Chicken]

Originally posted by Synergy
There is nothing wrong with a RAQ, just in my opinion. People with CGI LOOPS can drain the raq to its knees. :) Please don't find me offensive, I'm a CPanel fan..

I'm sorry to add to the tangent of this thread *but* as someone who runs a RaQ server, I have to correct the non-sense. RaQs are far from the most powerful server on the planet, that's a given, but they serve web pages and run scripts just fine.

Synergy states that, "People with CGI LOOPS can drain the raq to its knees. :) Please don't find me offensive, I'm a CPanel fan", as if cpanel servers magically would not be affected by endless CGI loops? This is not a valid reason to pass on this host.

Anthing else I have to say would not have to do with the services of the compnay you mentioned. I've never used them for anything. /tangent