PDA

View Full Version : W00t!



Robert
May 12th, 2004, 21:22
http://aboutrob.us/tmp/bebe.jpg

Woot!! It works. Yay!!

stabme
May 12th, 2004, 21:33
ability to post images is going to get out of hand...? what? how? .... last time i checked, tons of forums have that ability..

cowax
May 12th, 2004, 23:09
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/signs/sign4.jpg

Wojtek
May 12th, 2004, 23:52
http://www.free-msn-emoticons.com/fws/1.jpg
http://www.free-msn-emoticons.com/fws/2.jpg
http://www.free-msn-emoticons.com/fws/3.jpg

jmiller
May 13th, 2004, 00:10
http://members.shaw.ca/j.miller/notyours.jpg
following the trend ...

Gayowulf
May 13th, 2004, 00:56
http://upload.houseboat-racing.biz/files/hayguys.jpg

just thought I'd drop in on your thread.

Blank Verse
May 13th, 2004, 02:46
I'm a big fan of the new picture posting ability, but, like cowax' picture, anyone who says w00t shall have their balls removed.

tandoc
May 13th, 2004, 02:50
and prosecuted

darkcurves
May 13th, 2004, 03:42
http://www.ktmrailwayfan.com/files/store/car.jpg

Blank Verse
May 13th, 2004, 04:05
nice pic, darkcurves.

trenzterra
May 13th, 2004, 04:28
http://www.kingkamali.com/gallery/arnold2002/large/middle%20finger%202002%20arnold%20expo.jpg

darkcurves
May 13th, 2004, 04:39
nice pic, darkcurves.

I was wondering why the hell the pic not coming up, i forgot to disable Hotlink Protection. It works now.

Blank Verse
May 13th, 2004, 04:53
that it does.

Robert
May 13th, 2004, 08:02
I was wondering why the hell the pic not coming up, i forgot to disable Hotlink Protection. It works now.
and still a nice pic!!

Robert
May 13th, 2004, 08:03
I'm a big fan of the new picture posting ability, but, like cowax' picture, anyone who says w00t shall have their balls removed.It was my W00t! that made you come into this thread!

Blank Verse
May 13th, 2004, 13:47
it was...but it was also your w00t that is going to makie me hit you in the face with a shovel.

Robert
May 13th, 2004, 13:55
it was...but it was also your w00t that is going to makie me hit you in the face with a shovel.
awww http://freewebspace.net/forums/images/new/cry.gif http://freewebspace.net/forums/images/new/cry.gif

trenzterra
May 14th, 2004, 04:42
it was...but it was also your w00t that is going to makie me hit you in the face with a shovel.
Your balls shall be removed...

darkcurves
May 14th, 2004, 09:04
What does w00t mean?

Robert
May 14th, 2004, 13:38
What does w00t mean?http://www.aboutrob.us/tmp/banner-orange.gif

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=woot&f=1

Bruce
May 14th, 2004, 15:45
[im]http://media.urbandictionary.com/banner-orange.gif[/img]

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=woot&f=1You shouldn't hotlink.

Robert
May 14th, 2004, 15:48
You shouldn't hotlink.
I have permission.

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 16:04
You shouldn't hotlink.
Everyone is, and quite frankly it pisses me off.
This was bound to happen though.
And Darkcurves, just because the host hasn't diabled hotlinking doesn't give you the right to do so.

Wojtek
May 14th, 2004, 16:38
jmiller, why are you so upset about hotlinking?

Bruce
May 14th, 2004, 16:47
jmiller, why are you so upset about hotlinking?
Maybe because it's theft?

Hotlinking is bad netiquette.

Wojtek
May 14th, 2004, 16:52
depends on the way you look at it.

If your hotlinking numerous pictures/design/images/etc off some other site for your own site, then yes, this can be considered as theft.
But in this thread poeple are showcasing phones wich is nothing different then if you'd show a printed ad to someone.

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 17:55
Think about the number of people viewing the images every time they open the thread -- it's theft, plain and simple.
Is Bruce the only other sane one around here?

velton
May 14th, 2004, 18:06
http://graphic.----.la/footer/me.gif

my pixel baby .. that's me .. yea~!

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 18:08
that makes me think of dio, which in turn makes me sick to my stomach.

Epgs
May 14th, 2004, 19:25
This one is for Robert (although I do think this is cool) I missed a lot when I was away.

http://brawl-hall.com/gallery/data/media/5/cookie2.jpg

Gayowulf
May 14th, 2004, 19:57
Maybe because it's theft?


just like stealing sattelite signals?

cowax
May 14th, 2004, 20:07
The img tag has been up for two days and there's people -----ing about it (or something to do with it) already :rolleyes:

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 20:10
The img tag has been up for two days and there's people -----ing about it (or something to do with it) already :rolleyes:that would be because it is being abused, already.

darkcurves
May 14th, 2004, 20:15
Dude, if they know people are going to hotlink their images and steal their bandwidth, they most probably would have disabled hot-linking. Dont tell me you're so goody-goody.

cowax
May 14th, 2004, 20:16
Ive only seen it used in this thread. It will naturally be abused in a thread that says the img is finally enabled. I havent seen it used in any other thread yet.

EDIT: ok, I didnt see that cell phone thread yet :redface2:

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 20:52
Dude, if they know people are going to hotlink their images and steal their bandwidth, they most probably would have disabled hot-linking. Dont tell me you're so goody-goody.Oh, if that's the case then you shouldn't mind this at all.

http://www.57host.biz/images/header2_1.jpg

Bruce
May 14th, 2004, 21:08
just like stealing sattelite signals?
Not exactly sure where that came from... but yes.

Robert
May 14th, 2004, 21:14
guys!! ok let's stop before Peo decides to disable images. geez.

jmiller
May 14th, 2004, 21:19
guys!! ok let's stop before Peo decides to disable images. geez.The solution is simple -- individuals need to stop hotlinking. End of story.

stabme
May 15th, 2004, 02:13
ive never seen somewhere where linking images was so hated. it seems like pure insanity to me. here i thought images were practically public domain--if they're available for public view, then they must be public.

cowax
May 15th, 2004, 02:21
ive never seen somewhere where linking images was so hated. it seems like pure insanity to me. here i thought images were practically public domain--if they're available for public view, then they must be public.

... except when they are on somebody else's server who has to pay for the bandwidth. If they dont want people linking from their images then they could stop it.

TRUNKS
May 15th, 2004, 08:10
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/3063/3d.png

Now thats good 3D.

trenzterra
May 15th, 2004, 08:45
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/3063/3d.png

Now thats good 3D.My god, that's sharp.

TRUNKS
May 15th, 2004, 08:53
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/4161/horusEgyptianFalconknife.jpg

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/1627/dragonlord.jpg

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/9862/homer2.gif

tandoc
May 15th, 2004, 09:04
most of it is good, except the blinds, which are really, really bad..

xD

darkcurves
May 15th, 2004, 09:51
Oh, if that's the case then you shouldn't mind this at all.

http://www.57host.biz/images/header2_1.jpg

Nope, i dont. I purposely enabled hot-linking. Hotlinking for my personal websites are disabled.