PDA

View Full Version : Shrek...again. (#3)



TRUNKS
July 8th, 2004, 09:55
Quote:
"With Shrek 2 having earned $260.3 million at the domestic box office in just 13 days, DreamWorks is scrambling to get Shrek 3 on a faster track, reports Variety. The studio has hired Peter Seaman and Jeffrey Price - who together wrote How the Grinch Stole Christmas - to pen the next installment in the franchise. Jon Zack is onboard as a consultant.

Additional writers, including those from the first films, may be brought on in coming months to polish the script. (The first two "Shrek" movies were each worked on by almost half a dozen writers.) Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz and Eddie Murphy are expected to return to voice the three leads.

As early as January - four months before the release of Shrek 2 - DreamWorks was quietly mobilizing the development of Shrek 3, in which Shrek will contend with King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table. The studio is targeting a holiday 2006 release."

http://www.comingsoon.net/news.php?id=4967

Bios
July 8th, 2004, 10:03
Wonder if your thread title will be there Movie name :)

Robert
July 8th, 2004, 11:17
Great movies. Can't wait for the 3rd one.

darkcurves
July 8th, 2004, 12:20
Second one was ok. First is the best.

Abush
July 8th, 2004, 12:34
Movies are always like that the first one is realy great and the second one is ok. :/

Robert
July 8th, 2004, 12:36
Not true.

Take for instance.. The GodFather.

Jeeper Creepers II is wayy better then the first.

Scary Movie 3 (IMO) much funnier then the 1st and 2nd

kaliboy2g
July 8th, 2004, 12:51
Movies are always like that the first one is realy great and the second one is ok. :/


For a lot of movies yes, but like robert said, some are made better.

Nick
July 8th, 2004, 15:04
Scary Movie 3 was funny?

Maybe I should watch it again....

Nah, couldn't be.

The Mad Max series didn't follow the first movie was the best scheme. The second movie was the best of the trilogy.

kaliboy2g
July 8th, 2004, 15:29
The reason some movies turn out like that is that the first movie of a series comes out well and makes a lot of money and the producers want more so they quickly come out with a sequel. Take the matrix for instance

Dean
July 8th, 2004, 21:45
Shrek 4 is in the pipeline too

tandoc
July 8th, 2004, 23:14
The reason some movies turn out like that is that the first movie of a series comes out well and makes a lot of money and the producers want more so they quickly come out with a sequel. Take the matrix for instance

i think i can safely say that reloaded wasn't rushed out... and neither revolutions.. they were just made at the same time

kaliboy2g
July 8th, 2004, 23:38
I disagree. I hated the last two parts.

jmiller
July 8th, 2004, 23:41
I disagree. I hated the last two parts.How can you disagree with what he said?

Tandoc didn't say anything about the quality, but stated the fact that the second two movies in the Matrix trilogy were not rushed.

kaliboy2g
July 8th, 2004, 23:43
Well when i said rushed out the first time i was implying that a rushed out movie is of bad quality

Nick
July 9th, 2004, 00:16
You can take a long time on a movie, and have it still come out ----ty.