PDA

View Full Version : http://www.ssales.com


Lynks
June 5th, 2001, 09:36
Anyone used them?

Lynks
xtony
June 5th, 2001, 10:51
Pinging www.ssales.com [61.202.203.178] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=545ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=544ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=234

Ping statistics for 61.202.203.178:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 541ms, Maximum = 545ms, Average = 543ms

C:\WINDOWS>ping www.hypermart.net

Pinging www.hypermart.net [206.253.217.32] with 32 bytes of dat

Reply from 206.253.217.32: bytes=32 time=493ms TTL=236
Reply from 206.253.217.32: bytes=32 time=499ms TTL=236
Reply from 206.253.217.32: bytes=32 time=504ms TTL=236
Reply from 206.253.217.32: bytes=32 time=489ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 206.253.217.32:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 489ms, Maximum = 504ms, Average = 496ms


:p They seem too slow... and not support any kind of cgi script.......
and they support ssi.
ducktape
June 5th, 2001, 11:07
where r u pinging from?

ping rates depend on your location, network traffic, your connection speed, and alot of other things. so whats slow to you may not be slow to everyone else
meow
June 5th, 2001, 12:58
Slow from here too (Sweden). With 69 bytes they ping an average of 484 compared to a site on Directoris 210 and one on f2s 202.
NC_TOM
June 5th, 2001, 18:31
Strange.. they seem extremely fast from here in Northwest USA..

However they don't ping too great; I get an amazing 16 ms average ping from Hypermart right now while I get an average 130 ping from ssales.com
meow
June 5th, 2001, 18:53
I don't trust ping. f2s always ping good for me even if they are ---- slow when I go there with the browser. That they should be a little faster than Directoris is ridiculous. Guess one has to see ping as an indication only. ssales was slow with browser too.
Lynks
June 5th, 2001, 21:31
Very fast from Perth Australia. And Im Using a 56k Modem :)
LeX
June 5th, 2001, 21:45
Originally posted by michael p bennett
where r u pinging from?
Are you serious?! :eek:
thenri
June 9th, 2001, 09:56
Originally posted by xtony
Pinging www.ssales.com [61.202.203.178] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=545ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=544ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=234
Reply from 61.202.203.178: bytes=32 time=542ms TTL=234

Ping statistics for 61.202.203.178:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 541ms, Maximum = 545ms, Average = 543ms


:p They seem too slow... and not support any kind of cgi script.......
and they support ssi.

As somebody pointed out the speed at which your connection is made has more to do with the local loop than the server at the far end. That said ssales.com seems faster from Japan the US and OZ than it is from Europe.
They DO allow all sorts of cgi scripts and downloads (even .zip files) but they'll ban people who abuse the system so don't use it as a library .......... No adverts is a big plus factor.

tHenri :D