PDA

View Full Version : Reputation


Hobo
April 11th, 2005, 16:27
Can you guys fix this silly thing where we can't give reputation to the same member more than once? A very few people say things that are reputation worthy in my opinion and I want them to know it, but this weird limit is kind of hampering my abilitiy.
Peo
April 11th, 2005, 17:09
I think you can give reputation to the same person, but you have to give a number of other members reputation first.
Hobo
April 11th, 2005, 20:13
Yes, that's the problem I was talking about. That's what I meant by more than once. Sorry bout that.
Blank Verse
April 12th, 2005, 02:35
I like the idea of having to give more reputation points to others first, but there seems to be a ridiculously high number of points you have to give out before you can give repeat points to a member.
Hobo
April 26th, 2005, 18:13
*cough*

Did anything happen about this?
jmiller
April 26th, 2005, 18:25
*cough*

Did anything happen about this?
Doesn't look like it.

Personally, I think it is good to have restrictions on the number of times you can give a user reputation in a row.
Blank Verse
April 26th, 2005, 18:28
unless the person really deserves your negative reputation :p
Peo
April 27th, 2005, 02:28
I've lowered it to 15 now, it was 20.
Blank Verse
April 27th, 2005, 20:10
That seems reasonable.
Decker
April 27th, 2005, 21:13
It would to you 2 - why is jmiller answering when they've disabled rep ;p
jmiller
April 27th, 2005, 21:16
It would to you 2 - why is jmiller answering when they've disabled rep ;p
And who are you to tell me what I can and cannot respond to ?

Why should I not be responding to this?
Decker
April 27th, 2005, 21:22
Woo - settle petal - dont take a fence :)

PS nice legs LOL
jmiller
April 27th, 2005, 21:26
Woo - settle petal - dont take a fence :)

PS nice legs LOL
Well?

Why shouldn't I have posted that then, huh?

Is it any less valid than your off-topic response?
Decker
April 27th, 2005, 21:33
Oh come on - you have disabled rep.

And your replying in a thread about it!!
jmiller
April 27th, 2005, 21:36
So? That means I can't reply? It's just my opinion, it doesn't change anything. It's not like my decision would be based on whether or not I had it enabled.
Decker
April 27th, 2005, 21:41
Isn't this silly - you disable rep then comment on it - it's hypocritical.

PS I don't want this to get to an argument - it was just an observation to start.
jmiller
April 27th, 2005, 21:51
it's not hypocrytical whatosever.

it would be if it was in reference to my own reputation, however it isn't.
Decker
April 27th, 2005, 21:56
Why are you even bothering with this?
LeX
April 29th, 2005, 06:43
You think wrong.
LeX
April 29th, 2005, 06:47
What facts show is that your thinking is not correct.
LeX
April 29th, 2005, 06:50
How is it that I am rude? Did I tell you to shut up? Did I prevent you from expressing your opinions? No. But you?
LeX
April 29th, 2005, 06:51
I should have quoted your comments. Now only the mods can see what you posted.
niv
April 29th, 2005, 08:14
Are you bored, LeXxiep0o?
LeX
April 29th, 2005, 11:07
It would seem that way, wouldn't it. :rolleyes:
Blank Verse
April 29th, 2005, 13:33
who's posts got deleted?
LeX
April 30th, 2005, 00:38
TDLInternet
ryza
April 30th, 2005, 00:52
Iv been coming here for 3 years and didn't even know about it till now.

Whats so special about the reputation thing?
pdrucker
April 30th, 2005, 13:34
someone gave me a bad reputation just beacuse i responded to that post about the pope and said my own oppinion, but it wasnt like a terrible thing.
jmiller
April 30th, 2005, 13:57
someone gave me a bad reputation just beacuse i responded to that post about the pope and said my own oppinion, but it wasnt like a terrible thing.
yeah, that right there is the problem with the "reputation" system. =(
that and the anonymity. i love the anonymous death threats i received.
Blank Verse
April 30th, 2005, 14:35
Oh. Right...sorry, i meant to put my name on those :p
ryza
April 30th, 2005, 23:33
lmfao hahaha