View Full Version : Free Porn-Host with CGI-BIN
Lorenzo
July 23rd, 2001, 16:19
Hi,
Don't know if this question already has been asked..
But, does anyone know a FREE PORN-HOST wich supports a CGI-BIN?
I searched over 2 months now and still can't find any!
Can someone help me please?????
thnx!
hessan
July 23rd, 2001, 16:21
coolfreepages.com i thiiiiiinnnk not sure check it out
Docevl
July 23rd, 2001, 16:28
I am not sure if you are allowed to talk about porn here.
Weapon
July 23rd, 2001, 19:56
use the term ADULT it sounds better thatn PORN
Giancarlo
July 23rd, 2001, 20:19
Originally posted by Docevl
I am not sure if you are allowed to talk about porn here.
Yup, a lot of kids here including myself.
meow
July 23rd, 2001, 20:20
But it looks the same anyway! :D
It's allowed as far as I know. But if you link to porn sites include a warning since some of the minors on the board actually take offense if you don't (well, one).
Giancarlo
July 23rd, 2001, 20:35
But if you link to porn sites include a warning since some of the minors on the board actually take offense if you don't (well, one).
Not me... I really don't care... I just don't even bother opening the site.
Giancarlo
July 23rd, 2001, 20:39
Lorenzo: I notice in your profile it says you are 16... and you want to make a porn site? In most countries the minimal ages for visiting a porn site is 18 and even 21. Is it legal in your country for a 16 year old to make a porn site?
Nick
July 23rd, 2001, 21:19
He probablly figures he'll just setup a blind links adult site and make some cash to buy him some new stuff :p.
Giancarlo
July 23rd, 2001, 21:30
I hope so... but you don't want him uploading porn pictures of himself and his friends.
meow
July 23rd, 2001, 21:39
lol! I figure the world would be a whole lot better if porn hosts posted pictures of themselves. ;)
Giancarlo
July 23rd, 2001, 21:43
It could be considered child porn in most countries... if a 16 year uploads nude photos of him/herself.
meow
July 23rd, 2001, 21:51
Thank you for your explanation. This all is so confusing to me. :)
Gayowulf
July 23rd, 2001, 23:40
You would be surprised at how many Pr0n sites are run by minors. Usually the authorites dont care too much about wouis running it as long as it is legal. Also a picture of someone under 18 doesnt constitute child porn.
Chris
July 24th, 2001, 00:22
I'm pretty sure that a nude picture does.
Gayowulf
July 24th, 2001, 00:41
Heres the law
US Code as of: 01/23/00
Sec. 2256. Definitions for chapter
For the purposes of this chapter, the term -
(1) ''minor'' means any person under the age of eighteen years;
(2) ''sexually explicit conduct'' means actual or simulated -
(A) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital,
oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between
persons of the same or opposite sex;
(B) bestiality;
(C) masturbation;
(D) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or
(E) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of
any person;
(3) ''producing'' means producing, directing, manufacturing,
issuing, publishing, or advertising;
(4) ''organization'' means a person other than an individual;
(5) ''visual depiction'' includes undeveloped film and
videotape, and data stored on computer disk or by electronic
means which is capable of conversion into a visual image;
(6) ''computer'' has the meaning given that term in section
1030 of this title;
(7) ''custody or control'' includes temporary supervision over
or responsibility for a minor whether legally or illegally
obtained;
(8) ''child pornography'' means any visual depiction, including
any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or
computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by
electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit
conduct, where -
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use
of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor
engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or
modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in
sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented,
described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the
impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction
of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(9) ''identifiable minor'' -
(A) means a person -
(i)
(I) who was a minor at the time the visual depiction was
created, adapted, or modified; or
(II) whose image as a minor was used in creating, adapting,
or modifying the visual depiction; and
(ii) who is recognizable as an actual person by the
person's face, likeness, or other distinguishing
characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other
recognizable feature; and
(B) shall not be construed to require proof of the actual
identity of the identifiable minor.
Thats the Law.
xtony
July 24th, 2001, 00:59
Try coolfreehost.com.But they don't support cgi.They do PHP.
Not long time ago,I like hostonfly.net but they don't support mysql.and worse of support.:(
Weapon
July 24th, 2001, 06:01
Originally posted by Giancarlo
I hope so... but you don't want him uploading porn pictures of himself and his friends.
or meow's pic :eek: :eek: :eek: wait a sec ...... **** he already have!!! my eyes!!!
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 09:10
You would be surprised at how many Pr0n sites are run by minors. Usually the authorites dont care too much about wouis running it as long as it is legal. Also a picture of someone under 18 doesnt constitute child porn.
I certainly hope that most are not runned by minors. I am pretty sure there is a law against it, Gayo... I just can't remember where it was.
Lorenzo
July 24th, 2001, 09:24
Hey Guys,
I asked some adult-business Companies (so not the support of the adult-sites but the people en CEOs of companies who run them) about the age you must have to build a adult-site. They all told me there wasn't any age to build a legal adult-site.
But hey, this is The Netherlands... We don''t have the same rules as The US or something.
I was told, that in The US or in The UK, you will have to be 18 years old to drink alcohol. In The Netherlands you can drink on your sixteenth.
But as long as you don't make illegal Adult-Sites or post pictures of minors.. there shouldn't be any problem.. right?
niv
July 24th, 2001, 09:30
in the US, alcohol is allowed for people 21+, and tobacco (why the hell would anyone smoke, i dunno) is allowed for non-minors (18+)
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 09:31
This is obviously a loop-hole in international, and US law.
How old is the limit of viewing porn? 18 or 21? Then you wouldn't be abled to make the site, because you would have to look at porn.
I am quite sure 18 (for viewing porn) is an international standard.
meow
July 24th, 2001, 09:35
Probably not. "Law and order" is kind of an always present item here. Facts usually aren't in the picture. Don't mind.
Welcome to the board and try to bear with us;)
Oops. This was re Lorenzo up there.
Lorenzo
July 24th, 2001, 09:44
I don't think its an international standard.
I'm 16 but I am allowed to hire some porn-movies. And those porn-movies have exactly the same exposure as movies that can be hired when your 18.
Sometimes when my friends and I get bored, we just take a walk past some "red-light" districts (we don't do anything, just walking and looking.. not special about it though).
There are so many cops hanging around there and they do nothing!
I don't know about this in other countries, but Holland is just a free country as long as you dont do anything stupid.
gyrbo
July 24th, 2001, 12:39
Originally posted by needcgispace
in the US, alcohol is allowed for people 21+, and tobacco (why the hell would anyone smoke, i dunno) is allowed for non-minors (18+)
I'm 13 and I can get a pack a sigarettes easely. It's legal in here.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 12:58
The Laws in Argentina are strict because this country is conserative. The Minimal Age for viewing porn is 21, the Minimal Age for drinking is 21. Smoking is 18. There aren't any noticable porn clubs in town, most were shut down by court orders and Police Raids.
meow
July 24th, 2001, 12:59
Originally posted by gyrbo
I'm 13
:eek:Is that true?!
meow
July 24th, 2001, 13:12
Originally posted by Giancarlo
The Minimal Age for viewing porn is 21
That sounds very peculiar. Sure it isn't something your mother has told you? [colos=blue];)<----JOKE[/color]. I mean, would you actually be punished for viewing porn on the Internet or a video? The opposite should be more common, that it's illegal to sell or let porn to minors.
There aren't any noticable porn clubs in town, most were shut down by court orders and Police Raids.
Isn't many here either. But that depends on that they don't get many customers. Could have to do with that it isn't illegal to have sex here, no matter what age you are.:confused:
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 13:19
Originally posted by meow
That sounds very peculiar. Sure it isn't something your mother has told you? ;)<----JOKE. I mean, would you actually be punished for viewing porn on the Internet or a video? The opposite should be more common, that it's illegal to sell or let porn to minors.
It is considered a federal offensive if a minor does view porn on the internet. It is very illegal here to sell porn to minors, and in this country you have to wait five years in prision waiting for court processing.
Isn't many here either. But that depends on that they don't get many customers. Could have to do with that it isn't illegal to have sex here, no matter what age you are.:confused:
I think there should be a restriction on the age of to have sex, thinking of two 13 year olds having sex is utterly disgusting in my opinion. I feel that if there are restrictions there could be less STDs. Just my opinion.
meow
July 24th, 2001, 13:28
Yes, but it's a big difference between a curious kid taking a peek and a sleez ball selling it to him or her, don't you think?
thinking of two 13 year olds having sex is utterly disgusting in my opinion.
lol! It doesn't get me aroused either, but I do hope it isn't disgusting to them. ;)
gyrbo
July 24th, 2001, 13:31
Originally posted by meow
:eek:Is that true?!
Yes, what's the problem?
Lorenzo
July 24th, 2001, 13:32
Giancarlo typed:
I think there should be a restriction on the age of to have sex, thinking of two 13 year olds having sex is utterly disgusting in my opinion. I feel that if there are restrictions there could be less STDs. Just my opinion.
But I don't think this would be the best option in my opinion. If there is a restriction on the age of having sex, for example.. you may not have sex until your 16.., then those 13 years old are afraid to buy condoms etc. so they have unsafe sex...
I don't say these things happen.... and I don't think your opinion is wrong...(so no offence)
it's just our opinion...
meow
July 24th, 2001, 13:45
Agree. I'm not saying that most 13 years old are ready to have sex. Some have it anyhow. What's the use of adding a lot of guilt? And as you said, there are also the matter of pregnancies and deceases.
Gyrbo -I was just surprised. I thought you were much older. It's a compliment. :)
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 14:15
I am saying so society can be in line, the limit to having sex should be 18, as it is in most countries. I am certainly not a liberal if you take a look at my signature, but nonetheless society should have limits.
meow
July 24th, 2001, 14:28
Yeah, we here what you are thinking. We don't agree. BTW I don't think most nations have that 18 years limit.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 14:33
Well in the US there is, but it certainly isn't enforced. Anyone could get away with it anyways, the Cops are catching murderers and ticketing people on the Highways instead. What reason do you have for disagreeing?
meow
July 24th, 2001, 14:43
Me? I have told some of them. Besides that I don't see sex as something shameful or sinful. The age when you are mature enough I should say is very individual. To make it a crime seems medieval. No offense. You aren't responsible for the laws of your country.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 15:00
I am atheist remember... sinful is a word that has no use to me.
Anyways, I understand your position on this issue.
meow
July 24th, 2001, 15:15
Thanks. :) Well, even if you are an atheist you come from a Catholic country and I don't. I think religion has an impact on the general view in a society.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 17:28
Yeah, I am from Spain... and my Dad is Italian, though he was born in the US... his father is from Sicily. So both sides of my family are from Catholic Countries. I think both of the countries I am from are moving away from religion like the rest of Europe is, but not as quickly.
In Argentina what is strange is 10% of the people here actually practice any faith, and 30-40% of the population believes in God... this country tries too hard to be like Europe. Something is really strange about this country...
Anyways, I hope that you are not planning of uploading porn of yourself. I can't believe that a 16 year old wants to make a porn site.
syd
July 24th, 2001, 17:50
There are immature 18 year olds but there are mature 14 year olds... it is not you or society's position to govern when someone is mature enough for sexuality.
I am 17 years old (my boyfriend is 18) and I am sexually active, as I am mature enough and know responsibilities. Perhaps Giancarlo you are just mad because you have never had a serious girlfriend therefore the idea of sex is never an issue with you. Maybe you are just a prude.
If I am supposed to wait until I'm 18 to have sex... then why did I become sexually mature (physically) at 12?
Obviously Mother Nature disagrees with you.
And FYI, consent in my country is 14 years old I believe.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 18:50
I don't do things that are considered risky... and I certainly do not want to get any STD. I want to live a healthy life, even if that makes me bitter like Nixon. I am not mad... and I had a girlfriend before I moved to Buenos Aires. Mad about what? I have bigger things in my life, my ambitions, my goals... great I am sounding like Nixon already.
syd
July 24th, 2001, 19:54
And what is making the legal age 18 going to do? If someone's stupid enough to get an STD at 14 then they are stupid enough to get an STD at 34. A set legal age is irrelevent when it comes to an international standard. ESPECIALLY an American standard, which has been cited numerous times in this thread. Remember, most of the world is not American, does not have the same values as America either. Different cultures produce a different type of person. My cousin is the exact same age as me [17]. She is married, I am not.
Imagine if I told her she wasn't mature enough until 18 to become sexually active? She'd laugh at me! Her friends would laugh, my family would laugh, because that is odd to us.
For the record if you are curious, we are Hungarian.
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 20:03
It will do absolutely nothing. I know I most of the world is not American. Do you think I am stupid? Anyways try to watch what you say to me, like this statement my temper is quite thin:
"Perhaps Giancarlo you are just mad because you have never had a serious girlfriend therefore the idea of sex is never an issue with you. Maybe you are just a prude."
syd
July 24th, 2001, 21:19
This is a messageboard... I am not "scared" of your temper. I will not "watch" what I say to you because I can say whatever I want as long as it's within this site's guidelines. Peo directs what I can say, not you. That thought just came to mind when I was posting. I still feel that way.
I mentioned America because that's what most people on this thread are debating the age levels from. I was just saying that to most people in this world those limits mean nothing because we aren't American.
I think it's not worth debating between us because you are very conservative (perhaps because of your culture) whereas I am the complete opposite (because of my old-country culture where us girls get married at 15 and that's normal to us). Butting heads never resolves anything, doesn't it?
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:25
I think it's not worth debating between us because you are very conservative (perhaps because of your culture) whereas I am the complete opposite (because of my old-country culture where us girls get married at 15 and that's normal to us). Butting heads never resolves anything, doesn't it?
Agreed.
As Nixon said: "We should try not to make enemies."
stu
July 24th, 2001, 21:32
so Giancarlo... you been getting any "backdoor" action lately?
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:36
Originally posted by stu
so Giancarlo... you been getting any "backdoor" action lately?
You are walking on very thin ice. Cut the crap.
stu
July 24th, 2001, 21:37
what thin ice am I walking on?
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:39
It is a saying.
Why do you even think about asking me such a question? :mad:
stu
July 24th, 2001, 21:40
was I breaking the rules???
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:42
Such disgusting question... and if you want to continue with this way off-topic crap ICQ or PM me. You are breaking the rules of taking this thread off-topic. This thread has served its purpose, now I request it be locked immediately.
niv
July 24th, 2001, 21:43
hey stu, nice sig :p
stu
July 24th, 2001, 21:45
oh ok.. I just thought you were really open about your sexuality. you opened up very easily in the other thread about your gayness.. but anyways.. moving along....
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:47
About my gayness? Wake up stu... I am only attracted to one person of the same sex, and when I grow up it will probably fade away. I never am open about anything, that is why I am so often compared to Richard Nixon, I am quite bitter.
And your sig is nothing but inflammatory.
stu
July 24th, 2001, 21:53
uh huh
heh, I don't think there's anyone here who's as open as you are... I think sometimes we are given wayy too much info from you at times...
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 21:55
And I don't think anything is working out, and I don't think it was meant to be like this. Every single other past relationship I have had was with a girl AND ALL FUTURE ONES WILL BE WITH WOMEN. You want to continue with your sexual comments, PM me or ICQ and I will give you an attitude adjustment.
I am repeating that this thread should be closed.
stu
July 24th, 2001, 22:00
Originally posted by Giancarlo
And I don't think anything is working out, and I don't think it was meant to be like this. Every single other past relationship I have had was with a girl AND ALL FUTURE ONES WILL BE WITH WOMEN. You want to continue with your sexual comments, PM me or ICQ and I will give you an attitude adjustment.
I am repeating that this thread should be closed.
I already said "moving along...", but yet you keep talking and opening up about your relationships so don't blame me for bringing it up again.. Now you're telling me that you two are not so hot anymore...
what kind of attitude adjustment are you going to give me, wanna spank me?? :D
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 22:02
CLOSE THIS ----ING THREAD! STU, YOU JUST STRUCK MY ATTITUDE. AND YOU WILL PAY, I WILL BE BITTER TOWARDS YOU FOR NOW OWN.
Now you're telling me that you two are not so hot anymore...
WHEN THE HELL DID I SAY THAT?
stu
July 24th, 2001, 22:06
Hey, you said "And I don't think anything is working out", so doesn't that mean the relationship isn't going well?
Yes, I will pay dearly. Yes, your bitterness towards me will lead to my demise.. Yes..
Giancarlo
July 24th, 2001, 22:07
It isn't going well, because it isn't meant to be.
Gayowulf
July 24th, 2001, 23:25
Originally posted by Giancarlo
I am repeating that this thread should be closed.
Funny how when the tables start to turn, he wants an easy way out.
I agree with Syd and meow.
I know that in the netherlands people are quite open about sex, and kids are well educated about it. It leads to responsibility.
Nick
July 24th, 2001, 23:29
You think the whole 13 year olds having sex is gross? Well, a twelve year old girl had twins here a few years back, now last time i checked, it takes 9 months for a baby to come out the oven. Just ponder on that one :eek:.
I know a lot of people that lost their virginity at 13 for all the wrong reasons and it just makes me sick. This one girl had a kid when she was 11½ and twins a year later. I think she's about 14 now with 4 kids, and about 10 STDs. I live in the most boring town and my only idea of why this ---- is happening is that these kids are so bored they're f*ckin like rabits.
Gayowulf
July 24th, 2001, 23:35
it usually is for all the wrong reasons when it happens that young. thats partly why there are laws: A way to prosecute the older guys who like em young.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 09:33
Originally posted by Gayowulf
Funny how when the tables start to turn, he wants an easy way out.
Nothing is turning against me, it is just everything he is saying is going off-topic, and I am sick and tired of his imflammatory remarks.
Gayo, I believe the laws for older guys having sex with young girls around the age of 14, do get hefty punishment.
stu
July 25th, 2001, 13:12
nice
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 14:08
Originally posted by stu
nice
Spit it out because I want to get this garbage out of the way. And remove that from your sig, before I contact a moderator.
meow
July 25th, 2001, 14:35
Don't they ever grow tired of all your complaints? What would happen if we reported you every time we found you offensive? My, my, my. Peo would have to shop for more bandwidth.:rolleyes:
Pyro3k
July 25th, 2001, 17:10
i dont know, 2 13 year old doesnt seem sick to me cause thats when i lost my virginity, but the real part was, i had been goin out with the girl for a year, and it was her choice, then the relationship lasted 2 1/2 more years, till i moved from nj to florida, then she broke up with me, if it wasnt for the damn us laws that legal marriage age was 18, i woulda been married, and i would have loved my life, but i also do agree that there should be laws limiting the age of sexual intercourse, but still, even though we got the laws, its a 1 in a 600 times chance that one of the people involved in the act is gonna come forward and talk about it, so that means 1 in 600 times a kid in the us has sex only that 1 time will the older of the 2 be prosecuted, and figure this, there are almost 100 acts of sex(my best guess at average) with underage kids in the US a day, and thats at bare min. so that means at the average, in the usa alone, there are around 36000 sexual acts a year, u also gotta figure mst of the daily ones are by the same kids over and ove,r but even so, that would still only cut it down to 65 new acts a day... Pretty much what im sayin, is whats the point of a law, if its notgoing to be enforced at least at 50%, and this law is so unenforced, kids do it, to see what its like... If a country plans to make a law, at least enforce the friggin thing,
Nick
July 25th, 2001, 18:36
Originally posted by Pyro3k
and it was her choice
Haha. What bullsh-t! We you have sex it's both peoples' choices unless she had to handcuffed to the bed or something.
Gayowulf
July 25th, 2001, 19:00
Originally posted by Giancarlo
Gayo, I believe the laws for older guys having sex with young girls around the age of 14, do get hefty punishment.
Thats what the laws are there for. They only work when the dirty old man is caught or reported though
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 19:12
Originally posted by Gayowulf
Thats what the laws are there for. They only work when the dirty old man is caught or reported though
Unfornately, that is the way it is... the bum needs to be caught to be convicted of any crime. The only way it would work.
Max
July 25th, 2001, 19:20
In Sweden the legal age for having sex with anyone is 15.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 19:26
Well, actually I am sure a 23 year old couldn't have sex with a 15 year old.
Gayowulf
July 25th, 2001, 19:31
where i live the age is 14. A 23 yr old could legally have "relations" with a 14 yr old, as long as both parties consented, and the older one was not in a position of power ofer the younger. i.e teacher, babysitter etc.. if not it is considered rape. a 23 yr old could not legally have relations with a 13 yr old, even if consent was given. chances are, though, if consent was given no one would tell.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 19:34
Originally posted by Gayowulf
where i live the age is 14. A 23 yr old could legally have "relations" with a 14 yr old, as long as both parties consented, and the older one was not in a position of power ofer the younger. i.e teacher, babysitter etc.. if not it is considered rape. a 23 yr old could not legally have relations with a 13 yr old, even if consent was given. chances are, though, if consent was given no one would tell.
A 23 Yr old could have legal relations with a 14 year old? What is this world coming to?
Max
July 25th, 2001, 19:38
Thats sick anyway.. why do you have this discussion? Perverts
Gayowulf
July 25th, 2001, 19:38
I don't know... its wat the law is. Like Nick said, there is much worse hapenning. I dont even want to get started on prostitution.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 19:39
Originally posted by Max
Thats sick anyway.. why do you have this discussion? Perverts
Perverts? You have any idea how authoritarian I am compared to all of you in this issue? I want sex illegal until 18 is reached. I been called Ultra-Conserative, so I am hardly a pervert.
syd
July 25th, 2001, 19:49
You sound like a friggin' dictator... for the record my 17 y/o cousin's husband is 27, chew on that.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 19:54
Originally posted by syd
You sound like a friggin' dictator... for the record my 17 y/o cousin's husband is 27, chew on that.
Yes I am. What is this world coming to?
niv
July 25th, 2001, 19:59
Originally posted by Giancarlo
Yes I am. What is this world coming to?
Hey lastactionhero? Give the guy something to think about.
Giancarlo, have you ever read Nectar in a Sieve?
syd
July 25th, 2001, 20:08
Originally posted by Giancarlo
Yes I am. What is this world coming to?
It's moving from what it always was. You see Giancarlo, your "conservative" values are actually rather new. I'm not sure if you've versed yourself well in human history (scrapping political garbage, I'm talking the common folk and their reality here), you'd know that sex and marriage before 18 was normal. Infact, if you weren't married at 18, people would really wonder what was wrong with you.
A 13 year old (sexually active) or married to a 24 year old has been normal for thousands of years... it's not until now that anyone would consider it bizarre.
I wouldn't bother too much with it though. You may try and come off as being mature, but you really aren't. You are just pepped up on a certain idea and come off as a bossy know-it-all.
You'll mature someday... maybe when you're 18? I hope not, that would be the ultimate irony.
Giancarlo
July 25th, 2001, 20:11
Originally posted by syd
It's moving from what it always was. You see Giancarlo, your "conservative" values are actually rather new. I'm not sure if you've versed yourself well in human history (scrapping political garbage, I'm talking the common folk and their reality here), you'd know that sex and marriage before 18 was normal. Infact, if you weren't married at 18, people would really wonder what was wrong with you.
A 13 year old (sexually active) or married to a 24 year old has been normal for thousands of years... it's not until now that anyone would consider it bizarre.
I wouldn't bother too much with it though. You may try and come off as being mature, but you really aren't. You are just pepped up on a certain idea and come off as a bossy know-it-all.
You'll mature someday... maybe when you're 18? I hope not, that would be the ultimate irony.
Oh wonderful, now I am immature. YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW ME. I got my rights to beliefs. You cannot change that with your ranting.
Gayowulf
July 25th, 2001, 20:36
General Giancarlo, you must try to see the world as it really is. There is not much you, as an individual, can do to change it. You can bicker about it all you like, but the world really isn't that bad.
syd
July 25th, 2001, 21:03
Originally posted by Giancarlo
Oh wonderful, now I am immature. YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW ME. I got my rights to beliefs. You cannot change that with your ranting.
Of course I don't know you. And you don't know me. And I'm sure you don't know everyone out there who is sexually active and under 18. So quit presuming things because unless you understand each individual's situation, you have no right to tell them when they can take their pants off.
meow
July 25th, 2001, 21:13
Originally posted by Max
In Sweden the legal age for having sex with anyone is 15.
Ha! So now you confess that you are Swedish. Do you know why I suspected you were? Its quite funny. ;)
niv
July 25th, 2001, 21:46
I think that's the legal age (15) in japan as well. Not too sure.
youth of today
July 25th, 2001, 22:04
Originally posted by Gayowulf
General Giancarlo, you must try to see the world as it really is. There is not much you, as an individual, can do to change it. You can bicker about it all you like, but the world really isn't that bad.
I agree w/ gayowulf...
<<< mod edit, please try to be a little bit nicer, we don't allow personal attacks here. Thanks. /Peo >>>
Thanks for your time.
TJGuitar85
July 25th, 2001, 23:28
Umm Its illegal to have sex under 18 (or was it 21?) in the US. At least thats what they said in health class. And IMO smoking is far worse than drinking, smoking's just sick, why a 13 year old would smoke, is beyond me, but your never too young to have a strawberry daquiri if your parents are there/let you, at least when your on vacation in Mexico. =)
Dusty
July 26th, 2001, 00:16
Umm Its illegal to have sex under 18 (or was it 21?) in the US. At least thats what they said in health class.Then they're telling you wrong (I'm reminded of my post in the abortion thread...). The age of consent is 18, this does not mean you can't have sex until you're 18. It means an 18 year old can't have sex with a 16 year old (it would be statutory rape), but it in no way prevents that 16 year old from having sex with another 16 year old.
Smoking is disgusting. Drinking? I don't drink but I don't mind if anyone around me does, as long as they know when they've had enough (for some people, that's none).
TJGuitar85
July 26th, 2001, 00:23
Well That doesnt make sense for it to be illegal for 18 and 16 but not for 2 16 year olds. If its not illegal to have sex then how come its illegal to look at porn? I don't really drink,I sure as hell wouldn't in public. I'm 16. I would have NEVER thought other 16 year olds are having sex..until I met these people on this cruise this summer, and I'm like "dont you people get worried about STD's and sh!t?" and there like "ahh, no theres a cure for everything" well theres no cure for aids, or herpes, so thats crap.
hmm. I don't know maybe I'm biased because of my religion and values.
TJ
meow
July 26th, 2001, 01:08
Originally posted by Dusty
Then they're telling you wrong (I'm reminded of my post in the abortion thread...). The age of consent is 18, this does not mean you can't have sex until you're 18. It means an 18 year old can't have sex with a 16 year old
Thank you, thank you. I'm glad to hear the US law isn't written as GC reads it. :)
TJGuitar85 - you are joking, right? If not, don't you listen to radio, watch TV, read newspapers and books and do you use NetNanny when you surf the Internet? Don't take me wrong. I'm just concerned. :confused:
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 01:23
Originally posted by Dusty
The age of consent is 18, this does not mean you can't have sex until you're 18. It means an 18 year old can't have sex with a 16 year old (it would be statutory rape), but it in no way prevents that 16 year old from having sex with another 16 year old.
Here in Canada, it is not considered statutory rape if the two parties involved are less than 3 years apart in age. I don't know why the laws were written like that, or who comes up with them. I wonder where child molesters find lawyers.
Originally posted by TJGuitar85
your never too young to have a strawberry daquiri if your parents are there/let you, at least when your on vacation in Mexico. =)
I agree :)
TJGuitar85
July 26th, 2001, 01:25
I dont know waht the heck netnanny is, I dont read newspaper, i dont read books unless I have too, sure I watch TV, but thats TV. NOTHING on tv is like real life whether its star trek, or dawsons creek.
I havent listened to the radio since MIX 95.9 went off the air last summer.
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 01:32
Originally posted by TJGuitar85
I dont know waht the heck netnanny is, I dont read newspaper, i dont read books unless I have too, sure I watch TV, but thats TV. NOTHING on tv is like real life whether its star trek, or dawsons creek.
I havent listened to the radio since MIX 95.9 went off the air last summer.
Netnanny is gay. it is to block "bad" sites. At least you realise that TV is different than real life. many people don't; they treat life like a TV show. I wish i could turn them off.
TJGuitar85
July 26th, 2001, 01:35
Okay, thats even worse than AOL's parental controls. How many people out there that haven't looked at "bad" sites at least once before. heh. Even if they deny it, they know they have.
I wish life was a TV show, and could rewind it and redo things and stuff..lol..thatd be awesome.
TJ
meow
July 26th, 2001, 01:36
Netnanny is one of those devices that parents can use to protect their children from seeing or reading evil stuff, like anything concerning sex.
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 01:47
I have caught one of my parents looking at "bad" sites. It was fun
TJGuitar85
July 26th, 2001, 01:49
I saw some interesting stuff in my grandparent's history file. <G>
Lara Croft--Nude Raider.
I dont even want to know.
TJ
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 01:56
lol. i dont want to know either. what i found was funny excuses i got.
Pyro3k
July 26th, 2001, 06:20
i like livin in america and all that crap, but we are so ----in behind, our cars are the only good thing we got, even though they arent better then euro cars, there not bad, the rest sucks, we dont use metric like the rest of the world, almost 3/4ths the kids in the US arent required to learn a 2nd language, and they dont, we dont do crap, we are so behind, our laws suck cause we make them but dont enforce them, and because of the ---- down here that runs florida, who is our new presidents brother or sumthin, gore lost, at least gore would try and get more laws enforced, bush is gonna sit there and think about mexico, thats the only country he knew existed till he went to europe, now he knows that there are more then 2 countries in the world, we make laws dont enforce them, and we have the biggest armed forces in the world, at bushes disposal, now thats scary.... man, i m probably gonna move to canada, i like the cold more then the heat here in florida
Lorenzo
July 26th, 2001, 08:18
Hey hey!!
Chill-out guys...
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 09:36
Originally posted by Pyro3k
i like livin in america and all that crap, but we are so ----in behind, our cars are the only good thing we got, even though they arent better then euro cars, there not bad, the rest sucks, we dont use metric like the rest of the world, almost 3/4ths the kids in the US arent required to learn a 2nd language, and they dont, we dont do crap, we are so behind, our laws suck cause we make them but dont enforce them, and because of the ---- down here that runs florida, who is our new presidents brother or sumthin, gore lost, at least gore would try and get more laws enforced, bush is gonna sit there and think about mexico, thats the only country he knew existed till he went to europe, now he knows that there are more then 2 countries in the world, we make laws dont enforce them, and we have the biggest armed forces in the world, at bushes disposal, now thats scary.... man, i m probably gonna move to canada, i like the cold more then the heat here in florida
At least a Republican can have a period somewhere in his sentence. First off... you are wrong about America, we are far more advanced than Europe. We aren't behind, you are behind in knowledge and you take your anger out on Bush like those stupid hypocritical protesters. We don't have the biggest Armed Forces in the world, China does. Anyways we need our Armed Forces, not like you propose by letting it rot and so we can be attack and do ----.
If anyone wants to attack me, then go ahead. Youths of today, you are what I call a DL or Double Login, private message me if you want to attack me.
niv
July 26th, 2001, 09:44
I think the United States a little bit behind in terms of everything but academics. I have a feeling that in academics, the United States is far behind.
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 09:46
Originally posted by needcgispace
I think the United States a little bit behind in terms of everything but academics. I have a feeling that in academics, the United States is far behind.
Well I think you are wrong. Our economy is much more advanced, our industry and commerce is more diverse, our defense complex is more developed, and we have a government that actually works for the people.
niv
July 26th, 2001, 09:48
True, but you left out the academics. What is your take on that? Am I wrong as well? If you think I am, I will accept that.
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 10:46
Originally posted by needcgispace
True, but you left out the academics. What is your take on that? Am I wrong as well? If you think I am, I will accept that.
How can we have a very rich economy and yet have a poor education system? Something doesn't make sense there. I think the education system may be behind that of Europe, but still is decent enough to sustain a well-developed economy.
niv
July 26th, 2001, 10:53
The children of the United States don't have the attitude to want to learn, especially in the urban areas. I know you may find it hard to believe, but I had to deal with it every day a couple of years ago.
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 10:56
Originally posted by needcgispace
The children of the United States don't have the attitude to want to learn, especially in the urban areas. I know you may find it hard to believe, but I had to deal with it every day a couple of years ago.
If that is the case why does the US have the largest and most efficent economy in the world? Quite strange isn't it? It looks as if you don't need an decent education to make money from your standpoint. Most people I know in the US, like California... wanted to learn.
niv
July 26th, 2001, 11:00
I remember a little fake proof that was posted on a bulletin board using common statements and it came out to be the less you know, the more money you make :)
there are plenty of individuals who don't want to learn, but there also are plenty of individuals who want to learn. it's just the sign of the times.
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 11:03
Originally posted by needcgispace
I remember a little fake proof that was posted on a bulletin board using common statements and it came out to be the less you know, the more money you make :)
there are plenty of individuals who don't want to learn, but there also are plenty of individuals who want to learn. it's just the sign of the times.
On that first comment you said... Bill Gates is an idiot? Actually he did drop out of college didn't he? ;)
niv
July 26th, 2001, 11:10
Originally posted by Giancarlo
On that first comment you said... Bill Gates is an idiot? Actually he did drop out of college didn't he? ;)
he had willpower ;)
Giancarlo
July 26th, 2001, 11:17
Originally posted by needcgispace
he had willpower ;)
No kidding. :D
Man, we really are off-topic here.
Dusty
July 26th, 2001, 11:44
I don't think he ever did drop out, technically. He's just on a very very long leave. I believe that's what he said in his autobiography.
America is very far behind academically. Just because we have money doesn't mean we're smart. Yank an average person of the street, hand them an unmarked globe and ask them to point out France-- no, that's too hard, ask them to point out Canada.
Why does America still cling to the old English standard way of measurements? Because we're big, we have a lot of money and power, and we don't have to change. Arrogant? Yes, but we're America. If you think we're arrogant, it must be your problem. There was the whole "metric conversion" thing a while back that failed miserably. The main reason was we tried, instead of just switching from English standard to metric, to use both, and that just made metrics more confusing to the already easily confused public (a street sign that gives the mile count in whole numbers and the km count in decimal, of course the metric way looks more complicated).
The average American is just as he is portrayed on any "point and laugh at the American idiot" show you might watch. This is not news. You don't have to go to other countries to see them, either, we have those shows right here, except we call them "point and laugh at the people on the street". I find that sad.
Required to learn a second language? Ha! I took German in high school. The teacher was qualified to teach it as she had once been to Germany and could sputter a few broken sentences, I'm not exaggerating. I had better luck learning Chinese from reading the back of fortune cookie fortunes. My chemistry teacher was 20 years old. My Calculus teacher's lifelong dream was to amass a small fortune, go to Reno and turn it into a huge fortune, and retire and live out life as a house painter. My English teacher was actually a Russian teacher, but as he was literate to an extent, he qualified to teach English. The principal was fired because he went completely insane. He would talk to people standing a few feet away from him using a walkie-talkie with no batteries in it, and sometimes the people he would talk to were only in his mind.
"Free Porn-Host with CGI-BIN", my is this ever a tangent.
Pyro3k
July 26th, 2001, 18:58
gian, if u were here with us now, u;d understand the feelin andwhere we are comin from, we dont have the biggest armed forces in manpower, but we do in stuff we got, we got more planes then china in our air force, but china has more men in there airforce, but o well, yes, i do believe our economy is better then europes, but the other part is, we arent 100% hard working like europeans, we give up easy, just like academics as ncs mentioned, our acedemic stanards are low, im talkin if we brought in a 2 year old from london, he can probably pass the high school tests, hehe, reason our standards are so low is cause kids just dont wanna learn, iknow that cause i still am one since im still in school
Nick
July 26th, 2001, 18:58
Sex? Porn? Bad Academics?
What do you guys think about under age drinking?
:p:D;)
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 19:28
I don't have a problem with underage drinking, as long as it is semi responsible. I dont know many people who havent been drunk underage.
Largest and most efficient economy= most dangerous country.
At the moment i dont think a whole lot of the USA: There seems to be a trend to go against international consensus, and a tendancy toward unilateralism in the GWB White house. i.e rejection of international ban on germ warfare, a newfound desire to weaponize outer space, rejection of the Kyoto accord on reducing greenhose gasses (bad news), USA refused to sign the nuclear weapons test ban treaty, rejected the Ottawa accord banning the production, use and trade of landmines, and the US also plans to abandon the Anti-Ballistic missile treaty. so basically if the US decides to start another war, they will be one of the few nations able to use germ warfare, land mines, and test nukes in third world countries.
Nick
July 26th, 2001, 20:51
I don't think underage drinking is a problem either. Not that I do it, but I did it last night =\
Gayowulf
July 26th, 2001, 21:14
it is easier for a minor to get alcohol than many people think. in my town some of the liquor store employees are corrupt, and there is always some native around willing to buy you whatever in return for a couple bucks.
syd
July 26th, 2001, 23:45
My friends drink every weekend at my friends house. His mother buys us the alcohol however we only drink in the house, and she's always there. His mom is so laid back :) I don't see it as a problem, we're only 1 year under the limit anyways (19)
Max
July 27th, 2001, 00:37
Hmm.. aint we a bit off topic here? :)
Next time i will make a new thread i will include sex, drugs and alcohol.
jason
July 27th, 2001, 00:41
ha my friends grandma used to buy us alcohol and let us get drunk in the basement. she was pretty cool though. i was about 15 or 16 at the time i guess. she even tried pot with her grandson, i thought that was crazy. the pot smoking granny! lol.
as to the topic of kids having sex, i feel the more forbidden something is made out to be the more the kids wanna do it. the experts say early sexual activity could be caused by sexual abuse as children. also peer pressure, the media pushing sex down their throats. these guys like 23 years old that have sex with 14,15 or even 16 years old are often losers and still act childish and usually have no jobs.
Nick, your town sounds like one i live near, its common to see 12-14 year olds with babies. i don't know what it is but its sad. i think you could contribute this to low self esteem, abuse or lack of fathers in their lives. and of course alchol and drug abuse. and if they don't get male attention at home they'll seek it elsewhere and all girls know sex is an easy way to get attention. not to mention all the boys trying to prove their manhood by trying to sleep with as amny girls as they can and doing almost anything to do so.
And to the person saying america is behind because of its values on sex, well it could be true to some extent but if you start having sex at age 12 get pregant or married at age 16, it will be 10 times harder to get an education, post education to get a decent paying job. your basically gonna be working in the resturant service industry for the rest of your life or the degrading and self destructive job of being a stripper. things may be different in hungary but around here the boys at that age rarely take responsibility for children they may have created. and even if they did, how can a 16 year old support 3 ppl with a minimum wage job? even boys in their 20's often don't want to face reality and take responsiblity when it comes their way. i use the term boys because their not men if they're acting like that.
TJGuitar85
July 27th, 2001, 00:41
I guess he's pretty hammered when he typed that.
He's one year under the limit, yet he's 19.
;-)
syd
July 27th, 2001, 00:45
Originally posted by TJGuitar85
I guess he's pretty hammered when he typed that.
He's one year under the limit, yet he's 19.
;-)
Come again? Our legal age in Canada is 19 years old. We're 17 and 18. And I'm a she, not a he. I don't drink anyways, I'm the one who has to drive everyone home :(
TJGuitar85
July 27th, 2001, 00:54
OOPS, I misread that.
Oh well.
I'm 16, I'm not supposed to be smart.
TJ
Max
July 27th, 2001, 03:25
What the hell does this have to do with webhosting?
This is no childporn forum.. stop talking about underage sex things.. it is rather disgusting.
Pyro3k
July 27th, 2001, 11:48
jason, im 16 now, i was pannin to mary julie when she hit 18 and i was 19 so it'd be legal and crap like that, at 14, i worked at my school as a comp tech, i got 18 a hour, for the 7 hours of school i had, i was gettin paid to go to school and fix a comp not and then, now, i live in florida, i got a job that pays me 25 a hour, for 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 356 days a year, and im still a tech, just now its a server tech, and im on call so i get paid to sit at home and sleep, and do whatever i want, so moneys not a problem, i got 2 cars already, a mitsubishi eclipse and a low riding ford explorer, both 100% paid off, and im still under 18, so theres another way to say that moneys nota problem, if i had hit 19 and julie 18, and we had gotten married, i wouldnt care, by then i would probably own a house and have the same job but also own my own hosting company, so it wouldnt have made a difference, and julie knew that if i had gotten her pregnant, i woulda stuck by her, i never did and never would have cheated of julie, and she knew that to, so no, i wouldnt end up workin at a restaurant, with a lowly job, crack --- apartment and no job...
Gayowulf
July 28th, 2001, 00:27
Originally posted by Max
What the hell does this have to do with webhosting?
This is no childporn forum.. stop talking about underage sex things.. it is rather disgusting.
That probably why it got moved into the general forum. Lorenzo still hasn't been helped yet :(
Nick
July 29th, 2001, 16:38
Originally posted by Max
What the hell does this have to do with webhosting?
This is no childporn forum.. stop talking about underage sex things.. it is rather disgusting.
Ah, shut the hell up. This is the general forum where people come to interact and engage in conversation. Nobody asked you to read this thread. If you don't like it, don't read it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.