View Full Version : redesign
eMediaSales
January 23rd, 2006, 19:17
We have changed out look 100%
Check from waybackmachine to see the difference.
How functional would you say that this new design is?
EDIT: Sorry it's www.cari.net
Tree
January 23rd, 2006, 21:06
Um, what site?
I'm assuming cari.net?
Craig
January 23rd, 2006, 21:57
URL would help?.
JohnnyLi
January 24th, 2006, 20:56
The site looks nice and clean :) I like it. I think the "Dedicated Servers", "Reseller Hosting" and text similiar to that one your site looks too pixelated and a little too big. Overall, the site looks nice though :) Good job.
Eclouds
January 24th, 2006, 21:44
I like it, very interactive to the users and very clean as well as professional. Excellent job.
www.cooleon.us
January 25th, 2006, 01:04
Well, first of all, great effect!
What I like about the site, everything is concise and clear.
What I don't like, it starts out too gray, even tho the special effect is SUPER, but it can't make up a bad first impression. Know what I mean?
Pls review mine: http://cooleon.us/38
ozefrog
January 25th, 2006, 10:43
i would like to commend you on your use of XHTML 1.1 to achieve that design. VALID XHTML 1.1 i might add. The w3.org validator picked up 5 ampersands (&), in the document. They all occurred within hyperlinks. I havn't dabbled with XHTML 1.1 as yet, but if the same rules apply from XHTML 1.0 then you should be using & to represent an ampersand in your document.
eMediaSales
January 25th, 2006, 16:45
Wow, I really like that, I would choose that over google because of all of the other options (link to gmail, cool icons that zoom, tiny url, software lookup and the word game)
www.cooleon.us
January 25th, 2006, 20:06
Hey, thx there!
Do you think the word game should even be there?
And do you ahve any suggestions?
Thx again
Eclouds
January 25th, 2006, 20:22
You have to stop hijacking other threads. This has been reported to a moderator and I suggest you stop doing that. Thanks
hottweelz
January 25th, 2006, 22:36
He may hijack threads, but you got to admit, that's a helluva site.
cari.net is really nice. Is it just me or was it a little "slow" in firefox compared to IE? Can anyone confirm if the graphic changes on cari.net were slow with Firefox... maybe just the laptop I'm on.
www.cooleon.us
January 25th, 2006, 22:46
Thanks to hottweelz for saying something that has just made me feel so much better after reading brotherhewd's comment.
The website took me 2.6s to load with a 3mbps DSL
Eclouds
January 25th, 2006, 23:15
Cooleon it isnothing against you but you should read the rules first.
themoose
January 26th, 2006, 11:58
looks great, i love the way you've used text where most would use images. The rollovers are really great, but i think there should be more of a delay on "Pick Your Processor" and "Best Values".
9.5/10
eMediaSales
January 26th, 2006, 12:23
Thank you all for your input.
So would you all say that the website is origional?
themoose
January 26th, 2006, 13:51
i would say the design is original because it uses pictures minimally without losing any design :)
Decker
January 26th, 2006, 14:56
Very Nice
I like the fade in effect, very subtle (and quite origional as is the rest)
As T.M. says more delay on menu's - it is a very common mistake but not a fatal one.
Good choice of colour and layout - all in a big thumbs up :D
martin ewing
January 26th, 2006, 15:26
Site design is very nice. Fading effect, color combination and layout is done brilliant. I like the most important part that is "black and white" and colored design relation you have done. Well done! :-)
However, I agree with Decker on dealy on Menu's. :classic2:
eMediaSales
January 26th, 2006, 15:32
Awsome, I sent an e-mail to our webdesigner to look over. Props to him for the great job!
Decker
January 26th, 2006, 15:47
Don't give them a hard time as it's about the only thing anyone didn't like :D
Decker
January 26th, 2006, 15:48
Still have to say again the fade is great, looked again and it's actually quite soothing, so it would appeal to most browsing (probably as a bit of a relief).
eMediaSales
January 26th, 2006, 15:52
haha I Wouldn't give him a hard time at all, I think the site rocks.
I know that critique both positive as well as negative helps out.
Decker
January 26th, 2006, 15:54
Well all good from what I've seen, and good reason, very well done :D
eMediaSales
January 30th, 2006, 18:41
i would like to commend you on your use of XHTML 1.1 to achieve that design. VALID XHTML 1.1 i might add. The w3.org validator picked up 5 ampersands (&), in the document. They all occurred within hyperlinks. I havn't dabbled with XHTML 1.1 as yet, but if the same rules apply from XHTML 1.0 then you should be using & to represent an ampersand in your document.
Cari.net now validates perfectly as XHTML 1.1:banana: . Our web developer is constantly working to improve our site. So if there is anything that you notice, that you believe doesn't work feel free to share.:D
HostFrog
January 30th, 2006, 19:17
Thank you all for your input.
So would you all say that the website is origional?
Yes it looks good. Did Cari.net attend HostingCon05, or plan to attend 06?
chris207
January 30th, 2006, 21:08
I like it, clean look. I would like to see the fade in penguin thing fade in faster. It seemed to take too long.
eMediaSales
January 31st, 2006, 12:47
I know they (the CEO, CFO,COO, President, VP) went to some datacenter convention, i believe it was in New Mexico, not sure which one they went to.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.7 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.