OMGROFLBBQ, let's sue him....
I wonder if it's possible?
I'm not sure what this means, frankly I am shocked and offended. Unless you mean MicGoogle, in which case I approve.
Why? It isn't against the rules.I say Dan/Carl/Jan/Peo should remove Micgoole's avatar and infract the naughty boy :lol:
Why? It isn't against the rules.
Maybe he is Blank Verse? We never know xD I could be Ubuntu for all you know
I say Dan/Carl/Jan/Peo should remove Micgoole's avatar and infract the naughty boy :lol:
Why? It isn't against the rules.
Maybe it should be? Or at least a non-infractable rule.
I dunno about infraction for it. Theres no rule against it and UT certianlly doesnt own the rights to that image.
I dont think there should be a specific rule against it, but i do think that when someone is clearly copying a LONG STANDING users avatar and that user doesnt like it, then it should be removed.
As you can see by some of the replys, many people thought UT had just had a name change wich could have lead to all sorts of confusion if these guys were his clients.
MicGoogle since its kinda obvious the community doesnt like it, how about being a nice guy and changing it voluntarily?
I'm going to have the guy who invented the X Ray come back to life and sue you for using X in your company name! OMINERZ!
What a twat, stealing somebody else's avatar, he should be ashamed of himself.