Simpsons episode Who shot Mr. Burns part 1 anyone?
lol, that was a great episode. then he gets shot.
Simpsons episode Who shot Mr. Burns part 1 anyone?
To ask a country like the US and many others, to cut back on emissions at this point will cost billions of dollars and seriously damage the economy.
Well think what you want, I can't change that but don't believe everything the media says and a few things:
1) just because a country in debt is not a good measure of how the economy is doing, I'm not going to argue this point because if you don't know that then you don't know enough to be taking part in this argument anyways
2) okay, I know that the environment is the biggest thing right now in terms of long term affects, but you can't get stuck looking at the big picture and forget about the little things in front of you. the US and many countries like it DRIVES our world and international economy, whether you choose to believe it or not. And if they were to cut back on emissions and etc to a great extent then it WILL affect the ENTIRE world right now in a negative way. Don't believe me? Take some economic classes.
3) I do agree that we need to start using renewable energy sources, I'm just saying that some people who want the US and others to just turn their machines off doesn't know the whole picture.
4) I didn't say anything about the US government's ability to budget, in fact I'm not a fan of the way they do do it but still, you can't argue with the fact the US is one of the major powers in the world at this point and drives a lot of trade and international business.
If the US cut emissions, its economy would not have grown to what it is today.
To ask a country like the US and many others, to cut back on emissions at this point will cost billions of dollars and seriously damage the economy. I think that the consequences of doing so is not worth the "possible" results; because we, humans, have no been around long enough to say that we have influenced global warming at all. I mean, we weren't around here the last ice age came around, but it still happened. Maybe global warming is just the earth's way of recycling itself. I am not denying that there is global warming, though it isn't as significant as the media makes it to be, and either am I denying that humans create harmful gases; but I AM saying that we don't know and have no proof that what we are putting into the atmosphere has ANY affect on global warming.
The US needs to quit thinking as though the world revolves around it.
Americans: "Our country is big and powerful roar, you do as we say, arrrrr, and if we want to waste hundreds of billions on "defense", but don't feel like spending even 1 billion on fighting global warming, and we're screwing the entire world, well that's not our problem, muahahahah, ROAR".
I don't think its fair to generalize Americans in such a way as you did.
We have no choice in how our tax dollars are spent.
The US needs to quit thinking as though the world revolves around it.
Americans: "Our country is big and powerful roar, you do as we say, arrrrr, and if we want to waste hundreds of billions on "defense", but don't feel like spending even 1 billion on fighting global warming, and we're screwing the entire world, well that's not our problem, muahahahah, ROAR".
If the US cut emissions, its economy would not have grown to what it is today.
To ask a country like the US and many others, to cut back on emissions at this point will cost billions of dollars and seriously damage the economy. I think that the consequences of doing so is not worth the "possible" results; because we, humans, have no been around long enough to say that we have influenced global warming at all. I mean, we weren't around here the last ice age came around, but it still happened. Maybe global warming is just the earth's way of recycling itself. I am not denying that there is global warming, though it isn't as significant as the media makes it to be, and either am I denying that humans create harmful gases; but I AM saying that we don't know and have no proof that what we are putting into the atmosphere has ANY affect on global warming.
Well think what you want, I can't change that but don't believe everything the media says and a few things:
1) just because a country in debt is not a good measure of how the economy is doing, I'm not going to argue this point because if you don't know that then you don't know enough to be taking part in this argument anyways
2) okay, I know that the environment is the biggest thing right now in terms of long term affects, but you can't get stuck looking at the big picture and forget about the little things in front of you. the US and many countries like it DRIVES our world and international economy, whether you choose to believe it or not. And if they were to cut back on emissions and etc to a great extent then it WILL affect the ENTIRE world right now in a negative way. Don't believe me? Take some economic classes.
3) I do agree that we need to start using renewable energy sources, I'm just saying that some people who want the US and others to just turn their machines off doesn't know the whole picture.
4) I didn't say anything about the US government's ability to budget, in fact I'm not a fan of the way they do do it but still, you can't argue with the fact the US is one of the major powers in the world at this point and drives a lot of trade and international business.
Anyways, many won't agree with my views and that's fine but please try to remain civilized..I can sense a few people getting too excited. In the end, what you or I think doesn't really make a difference.
Have a nice day.
- Tang
Has anyone noticed yet that China is the dirtiest country in the world...yet the US gets blamed for the most emissions? China has hardly any emissions controls. They use HCL's and CFC's like they going out of style.
Remove MFN status from China, and things might look a little better. Now theres an idea that needs on the Senate.
Has anyone noticed yet that China is the dirtiest country in the world...yet the US gets blamed for the most emissions?