uhhh excuesmah (cool word) where does that link say that a AMD Hammer 1.6Ghz will BEAT a 3.06Ghz P4?
just because it SUPPORTS 64-bit processing doesnt mean it uses it ALL the time, only when calculating 64-bit processes ie. a program has to take advantage of this. 64-bit just doubles the amount of information that can be pushed per clock, ie. if you dont need to push alot of information per clock it is useless (bear in mind 64-bit applications are design to take advantage of this AND only 64-bit programs can take advantage of this.)
Just say you fire up the most latest, most intense game avaiable, the Hammer will just be like a 32-bit processor. Making the 64-bit useless. Unless you acually need it, don't buy it. Because it supports 64-bit processes it means that it will be more expensive, and because it increases the on die size by 20% means that it will be more expensive.
AMD might have a thing going on to boost 32-bit applications by the use of 64-bit processes, much like what Hyper-Threading does for the P4 (64-bit/2 = 32-bit, 2 processors)
Considering the cost of a new mobo, Hammer, and other 64-bit stuff that you will never use, it will possibly be a flump, causing AMD to die, yes i said die....
this Quater, AMD produced record losses, at the same time, intel posted a more than 500% gain.... so if AMD makes a flump outta this, say bye bye....