None of them are really that bad... they're still better than most of the stuff out these days.notnamed said:You speak as if only one of the new Green Day songs are horrible.
None of them are really that bad... they're still better than most of the stuff out these days.notnamed said:You speak as if only one of the new Green Day songs are horrible.
In theory, yes. But since they are overplayed and overloved, their medeocrity is magnified, making them seem much worse than if people just accepted them as what they are, bad-to-just-alright pop-"punk."Bruce said:None of them are really that bad... they're still better than most of the stuff out these days.
notnamed said:In theory, yes. But since they are overplayed and overloved, their medeocrity is magnified, making them seem much worse than if people just accepted them as what they are, bad-to-just-alright pop-"punk."
Oh, agreed. I didn't make that very clear... bad-to-alright music, but they do make for decent pop-"punk" if you go in for that kind of stuff. Most of their stuff is not mind-numbingly emo either, which is a rarity for current stuff in that genre.Agree with the first part, but as for the genre "pop-punk", they are among the best of the genre. Yes, the genre has some of the worst "music" on the radio, but Green Day is better than most.
Gayowulf said:William Hung is just bad downs syndrome karaoke.
Have you had a look at that mong? He's got to be the result of a birth defect.
Canuckkev said:With such a cool bandname, they should be less sucky.
Canuckkev said:With such a cool bandname, they should be less sucky.