• Howdy! Welcome to our community of more than 130.000 members devoted to web hosting. This is a great place to get special offers from web hosts and post your own requests or ads. To start posting sign up here. Cheers! /Peo, FreeWebSpace.net
managed wordpress hosting

3.06Ghz

Originally posted by guitarnerd
I bet you 1 cent (payable with paypal) that Intel will give a new name to a processor when AMD releases there next thing

Before you said Intel has the p5 coming out. Whatever happened to that hypothesis?
 
Figure of speach, I just meant they will come out with something new. Maybe the p5 maybe not...either way I bet they will get something.
 
Originally posted by guitarnerd
Figure of speach, I just meant they will come out with something new. Maybe the p5 maybe not...either way I bet they will get something.

Maybe something not costing a fortune like the Itanium or Xeon.

Not only is the AMD Barton/Hammer coming out, also the Opteron/Clawhammer.
 
Originally posted by Daniel
Maybe something not costing a fortune like the Itanium or Xeon.

Not only is the AMD Barton/Hammer coming out, also the Opteron/Clawhammer.

I doubt they will compare to the XEON or ITANIUN.

ARe one of the new AMD processors going to be 64bit?
 
Originally posted by Daniel
All of them are going to be 64-bit, with atleast 512k of L2 cache.
I heard Intel is going to release their prescott at 1mb l2 cache and 800mhz memory clock i think. now they are at 533mhz
 
Originally posted by trenzterra
I heard Intel is going to release their prescott at 1mb l2 cache and 800mhz memory clock i think. now they are at 533mhz

I said atleast 512 L2 cache, there will be versions with 1mb l2 Cache.
 
Arent AMD's new 64-bit chips going to be x86-based like the Athlon/Duron/K*/etc.? If so, watch Intel drop like a bird hit by a hunter. Intel's arent (at least I heard they aren't). :devious2:
 
Originally posted by Ben
Arent AMD's new 64-bit chips going to be x86-based like the Athlon/Duron/K*/etc.? If so, watch Intel drop like a bird hit by a hunter. Intel's arent (at least I heard they aren't). :devious2:

All current Intels already are as well as AMD drrr!
 
Originally posted by Daniel
I wonder what GC would say.

My guess would be..."Well in my Dad's military I fixed 2000 machines in one day because I used amd. BTW I am a gay virgin"
 
Originally posted by Daniel
Intel p4 = for the average user
AMD = the performance grunt

No no no!!!

AMD = 266mhz bus = slow
AMD = heat = slow
if (amd = overclocked)
{
System.Status = BOOM!;
}

INTEL = 533mhz bus = fast
INTEL = Cool running
INTEL = Reliability
INTEL = Overclockable
if (intel = overclocked)
{
System.Status = "Damn that is fast";
}
 
AMD = 333mhz bus = speedy
AMD = doing more work per cycle = heat(yes);slow(no)
if (amd = overclocked)
{
System.Status = VRRROOOOM!!!;
}

INTEL = 533mhz bus = fast
INTEL = Cool running = lazy
INTEL = expensive
INTEL = Overclockable
if (intel = overclocked)
{
System.Status = "Damn that is faster than stock, yet unstable";
}

I've seen XP 2800+ hit 3.4ghz and beyond, and guess what, it beaten a P4 3.06GHZ overclocked to 4.3ghz in 3dmark..
 
Originally posted by kabatak
not really, but if you have plenty of money you should have one. :D heh, rendering 3dsmax, maya and other 3d apps should be really fast using this processors.

only worth it if u have the ram to keep up









3.06ghz is useless, unless u like compiling the linux kernel
 
Originally posted by tandoc
only worth it if u have the ram to keep up









3.06ghz is useless, unless u like compiling the linux kernel

I do compile a lot of stuff that is all fairly large. I could put use to any processor
 
Back
Top