jmiller said:First, your flashlight comment wasn't properly worded, at all.
Second, who is to say the .GOV site contains statistics that are any less skewed than those put forth by a leftist media outfit?
Especially under Bush's power.
I don't doubt that.tandoc said:he has a point tho, whether or not true, it's far more credible..
Conscript said:My source isnt reliable? Notice its a .GOV site, and I think the gov't knows how much it owes. It's sure as hell more reliable than moveon.org.
That article is opinion based.Curtis H. said:John Kerry, who hopes to oust Bush, has blown much hot air Bush's way for the Iraq campaign. "It's not enough just to give speeches. America will only be safer when we get results," he said yesterday.
But for all the bluster, the Democratic wannabe did not echo Rockefeller's claim that Americans are less safe because of the war. Despite the Senate's critical report, even Kerry could not bring himself to say the Iraq war was wrong.
And that's because . . . it wasn't.
IRAQ: W. MAKES THE CASE
O'REILLY: OK. Did President Bush lie about weapons of mass destruction?Robert said:I'm all for War on Terror.. not war in iraq and iraq isn't where we need to focus. We were lied to and everyone knows it.
What does me saying we were lied to have to do with Edwards saying he thinks the war is a very good thing? Not a damn think. I think the war on TERROR is a good thing, and in a way, I think the war in Iraq is too. Saddam had his time. But the way Bush went about it, is wrong. He lied to us.Curtis H. said:O'REILLY: OK. Did President Bush lie about weapons of mass destruction?
EDWARDS: I don't know the answer to that question. I think...
O'REILLY: Do you have suspicions?
EDWARDS: Did I say that? You said that. First of all, I think this is something that we should treat not hysterically but in a very responsible way. I think it's a good thing that Saddam -- you know I supported the war in Iraq. I think it's a good thing that Saddam Hussein is gone. I think we should be proud of what our young and men and women in the military did. I think the result of the war is a very good thing. And I think now the responsible thing for us and the Congress to do is to determine if there is in fact a discrepancy between what the intelligence community, our intelligence community told us or told the president. I don't know what they told the president.
Transcript: Edwards Un-Spun
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45853-2004Jun16.htmlThere is "no credible evidence" that Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq collaborated with the al Qaeda terrorist network on any attacks on the United States, including the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackings, according to a new staff report released this morning by the commission investigating the hijacking plot.
So we either have a President who doesn't read what his people say, or, he lied to us. Or they are disorganized.Saddam Hussein... has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors
Curtis H. said:Michael Moore's movie is dissent, but his dishonesty within the film is dishonorable. Also, when he runs around Europe bashing America, he's giving comfort to our enemies, totally dishonorable and disgraceful in a time of war. You have to be careful where you utter anti-American statements. What's OK in Berkeley is not OK in Paris.
Dissent or Dishonor?
Make up your mind Robert. Did President Bush lie to "us" or not? Evidently Mr. Edwards was smart enough not to say that.Robert said:So we either have a President who doesn't read what his people say, or, he lied to us. Or they are disorganized.
Isn't that getting a bit old by now? You're smarter than that.Robert said:Bush wanted to finish his dad's work.
Try showing some respect for the President of our country. Especially in a time of war. Calling someone an idiot reflects poorly on you.Robert said:No it was our idiot President who can't speak properly.
He did.Curtis H. said:Make up your mind Robert. Did President Bush lie to "us" or not? Evidently Mr. Edwards was smart enough not to say that.
Ahh when we say something, it's old. But when reps keep talking about kerry's flip flop, it never gets old.Isn't that getting a bit old by now? You're smarter than that.
Respect? I have no respect for that man. We aren't at war.. or are we?Try showing some respect for the President of our country. Especially in a time of war. Calling someone an idiot reflects poorly on you.
Bush wanted to finish his dad's work.
So it's ok that he told the guy off? I know a million other ways he could have told the guy off. It's sad that you accept that.Conscript said:What's wrong with that? If a job has to be done it has to be done.
Kerry and Edwards both voted for the war and then voted against funding our troops who are there. So much for "being against the war but supporting the troops", they're voting record shows that it is in fact in reverse: they are in favor of the war and against the troops.
And on Dick Cheney telling that kook to "go f**$(@#$% himsef", he deserved it. This was a guy who goes out there and talks about how corrupt Cheney is and how evil the administration is how they lie to everyone, then Cheney shows up in the Senate and he wants to get in the photo op as if nothing has happened?
If someone who personally insults me and accuses me of corruption and incompetence wanted to do a photo-op with me and pretend like nothing happened I'd say the same thing!
VerticalHost said:BTW - if you watched ABC news today, you would have seen that in IRAQ there are still terrorist groups. We were not allowed to go into IRAQ, unless we declared war. So Bush had to make the American people believe that there was a reason to go into iraq. That reason was chemical weapons. Bush got our votes for going to war and so then he was able to go after the terrorists.
VerticalHost said:BTW - if you watched ABC news today, you would have seen that in IRAQ there are still terrorist groups. We were not allowed to go into IRAQ, unless we declared war. So Bush had to make the American people believe that there was a reason to go into iraq. That reason was chemical weapons. Bush got our votes for going to war and so then he was able to go after the terrorists.